Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Kerrydale Street. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use.

If you decide to register, please be aware that we don't accept email addresses from free web accounts like gmail, Hotmail, live.co.uk etc. Sorry, but almost all of the abuse and spam that we get is from free web accounts. The software on the forum will automatically block any requests using a free email account.

Upon Registration, you will be given access to all our varied Forums, and you will be expected to comply with our fairly stringent Rules and Regulations. Meantime, enjoy your visit

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The Board - general discussion (including Res 12); notes from the AGM
Topic Started: 15 Jul 2014, 12:03 AM (1,414,470 Views)
littlegmbhoy
Member Avatar
Club Captain
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
McAvennie
11 Sep 2017, 01:47 PM
Time for the other clubs to step up and put out a statement that matches their fans' stance. Aberdeen, Hearts, Hibs… for a start.
Dont hold you breath the house builder at the Sheep has said no chance and wants to move on much to their fans disgust...Hertz will do nowt as Budge aint interested..I think we are alone in this now going against the Celtic v Ranger V SFA that we wished for...

Edited by littlegmbhoy, 11 Sep 2017, 02:22 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dazabhoy67
Member Avatar
Off treasure hunting in Holland
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Is it possible the SFA believe they can ride out the UEFA License issue and put the blame squarely at the Rangers directors door?

The reason they don't want any review digging around the EBT/LNS/Liquidation issue, is because it would rumble the whole collusion post liquidation.

Was it not the SFA who provided the evidence to LNS, which just happened to leave out certain information, that would have been critical to a decision?( E.g. the false presentation of the wee tax bill)

There was also the Bryson explanation and the odd acceptance that LNS ruling was final and could not be appealed, even if the FTTT decision was appealed by HMRC?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bhoyball
Member Avatar
No trouble with trebles.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
So this it is only us that whats an enquiry . surely this can be proven or debunked pretty quickly by a few phone calls to club chairmen? Have the media done this?
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
puroresu_boy
First-team starter
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
dazabhoy67
11 Sep 2017, 02:10 PM
Is it possible the SFA believe they can ride out the UEFA License issue and put the blame squarely at the Rangers directors door?

The reason they don't want any review digging around the EBT/LNS/Liquidation issue, is because it would rumble the whole collusion post liquidation.

Was it not the SFA who provided the evidence to LNS, which just happened to leave out certain information, that would have been critical to a decision?( E.g. the false presentation of the wee tax bill)

There was also the Bryson explanation and the odd acceptance that LNS ruling was final and could not be appealed, even if the FTTT decision was appealed by HMRC?
They will argue the licence was given on the back of false information provided by diedco directors.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
murphio
Member Avatar
Could start a row in an empty room
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Who cares if we are on our own. If was primarily our club that was cheated. The question now turns to what we can do about it. We took on.tne SFA before and won. We can do it again. I get the feeling now there will be no need to have this crowd funded.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Wee Ed KTF
Considering retirement
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
puroresu_boy
11 Sep 2017, 02:16 PM
dazabhoy67
11 Sep 2017, 02:10 PM
Is it possible the SFA believe they can ride out the UEFA License issue and put the blame squarely at the Rangers directors door?

The reason they don't want any review digging around the EBT/LNS/Liquidation issue, is because it would rumble the whole collusion post liquidation.

Was it not the SFA who provided the evidence to LNS, which just happened to leave out certain information, that would have been critical to a decision?( E.g. the false presentation of the wee tax bill)

There was also the Bryson explanation and the odd acceptance that LNS ruling was final and could not be appealed, even if the FTTT decision was appealed by HMRC?
They will argue the licence was given on the back of false information provided by diedco directors.
The Rangers (IL) directors at the time included King, Potless Murray and Johnston. Dickson would also be involved.

Craig Whyte's pound coin was still in his pocket and he'd not yet been described as a Motherwell born billionaire and carried should high into Ibrox
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
puroresu_boy
First-team starter
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Wee Ed KTF
11 Sep 2017, 02:21 PM
puroresu_boy
11 Sep 2017, 02:16 PM
dazabhoy67
11 Sep 2017, 02:10 PM
Is it possible the SFA believe they can ride out the UEFA License issue and put the blame squarely at the Rangers directors door?

The reason they don't want any review digging around the EBT/LNS/Liquidation issue, is because it would rumble the whole collusion post liquidation.

Was it not the SFA who provided the evidence to LNS, which just happened to leave out certain information, that would have been critical to a decision?( E.g. the false presentation of the wee tax bill)

There was also the Bryson explanation and the odd acceptance that LNS ruling was final and could not be appealed, even if the FTTT decision was appealed by HMRC?
They will argue the licence was given on the back of false information provided by diedco directors.
The Rangers (IL) directors at the time included King, Potless Murray and Johnston. Dickson would also be involved.

Craig Whyte's pound coin was still in his pocket and he'd not yet been described as a Motherwell born billionaire and carried should high into Ibrox
So action against them would be expected if wrongdoing is proven?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MILLIGANS ISLAND
Member Avatar
....give us a glimmer......
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
murphio
11 Sep 2017, 02:21 PM
Who cares if we are on our own. If was primarily our club that was cheated. The question now turns to what we can do about it. We took on.tne SFA before and won. We can do it again. I get the feeling now there will be no need to have this crowd funded.
Exactly. Too many of the other club chairmen are compromised in some way or other,we were always going to have to do this ourselves.

Regan is clinging on to that job like eff,i'm amazed he has managed this far. He takes incompetence and corruption to new depths.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dan71
Occasional Substitute
[ *  *  *  * ]
Lawwell and the Celtic board playing a blinder. Hopefully Regan will tour the radio/TV studios making an even bigger cant of himself than he has already. If he's relying on clubfoot and Traynor for strategy then he's well and truly donald ducked.
Sadly he'll probably depart with his pockets bulging before being properly exposed for what he is at any formal inquiry/review.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dazabhoy67
Member Avatar
Off treasure hunting in Holland
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Wee Ed KTF
11 Sep 2017, 02:21 PM
puroresu_boy
11 Sep 2017, 02:16 PM
dazabhoy67
11 Sep 2017, 02:10 PM
Is it possible the SFA believe they can ride out the UEFA License issue and put the blame squarely at the Rangers directors door?

The reason they don't want any review digging around the EBT/LNS/Liquidation issue, is because it would rumble the whole collusion post liquidation.

Was it not the SFA who provided the evidence to LNS, which just happened to leave out certain information, that would have been critical to a decision?( E.g. the false presentation of the wee tax bill)

There was also the Bryson explanation and the odd acceptance that LNS ruling was final and could not be appealed, even if the FTTT decision was appealed by HMRC?
They will argue the licence was given on the back of false information provided by diedco directors.
The Rangers (IL) directors at the time included King, Potless Murray and Johnston. Dickson would also be involved.

Craig Whyte's pound coin was still in his pocket and he'd not yet been described as a Motherwell born billionaire and carried should high into Ibrox
TBH I'm not really bothered about the hun board being under the magnifying glass.

I want a review to prove what a sham LNS was from the start.

I think I seen someone mention it earlier, that an independent review(crowd funded) would not have access to all the information, as the SFA/SPFL would be under no obligation to co-operate. The authorities could also ignore the recommendations made by the review panel at its conclusion.

Which is why the SFA are fighting a judicial review, instigated by themselves, as they would need to open up and produce everything? They would also more than likely need to accept the findings and implement the recommendation's. (which could include title stripping)

Can anyone confirm if my above view is correct?

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tim Bombadil
Member Avatar
Getting on a bit
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
So Celtic v the SFA, MSM & the rest of Scottish Football?

No change there, always been the way.

Go for the throat Celtic
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bhoyball
Member Avatar
No trouble with trebles.
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
murphio
11 Sep 2017, 02:21 PM
Who cares if we are on our own. If was primarily our club that was cheated. The question now turns to what we can do about it. We took on.tne SFA before and won. We can do it again. I get the feeling now there will be no need to have this crowd funded.
I want to know the truth and so will other clubs fans. They desrve to know if their chairmen are happy to let this cheating go unpunished despite all of them being affected . Some by loss of trophies also
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
CM1975
Member Avatar
Club Captain
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Pedro should call SSB and ask a few probing questions of the that w@nk Regan.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TK57
Member Avatar
the thunder came back
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Feck the SFA, the Huns and the hun journalists. This issue should be cataclysmic for this scummy , cheating shower of bastards. They still think they were hard done too, and should have never been questioned about it because of who they are. (WATP mantra)

Liquidation should have been the end of them but the Scottish Masonic brethren let them slither back in.

Crush them, humiliate them at every opportunity. Carrots, with another carrot for a face.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pussyfoot
Ŕ la mode if you will
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Bhoyball
11 Sep 2017, 02:57 PM
murphio
11 Sep 2017, 02:21 PM
Who cares if we are on our own. If was primarily our club that was cheated. The question now turns to what we can do about it. We took on.tne SFA before and won. We can do it again. I get the feeling now there will be no need to have this crowd funded.
I want to know the truth and so will other clubs fans. They desrve to know if their chairmen are happy to let this cheating go unpunished despite all of them being affected . Some by loss of trophies also
The picture becoming clearer it does now look as though these owners, Chairfolk and Boards are quite happy for their fan base to pay in to a rigged affair, this will mean trouble for some of these clubs. The decision-makers have opened themselves to becoming collateral damage and we must now look at them as obstructionist and having an agenda set against their own fans wishes and our club.
Edited by Pussyfoot, 11 Sep 2017, 03:05 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ess
Member Avatar
Abooganza!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Regan must be bricking it if his only response he has left is to criticise the number of clubs calling for a review.
Might be interesting for defence lawyers to try to claim that only the CPS are calling for a court case.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
kellybhoy
Member Avatar
Play me or trade me
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
tinytim81
11 Sep 2017, 09:50 AM
kellybhoy
11 Sep 2017, 12:32 AM
tinytim81
10 Sep 2017, 09:56 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Judicial review has power to overturn a decision by a legal entity (e.g. tribunal). Independent review is just an enquiry conducted by an independent body that can only make recommendations.
So does that mean a judicial review could overturn the Nimmo Smith findings?
As I understand it yes. But we have lawyers on here who could confirm.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dazabhoy67
Member Avatar
Off treasure hunting in Holland
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
CM1975
11 Sep 2017, 03:01 PM
Pedro should call SSB and ask a few probing questions of the that w@nk Regan.
Alison Conroy confirmed on twitter it won't be live.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
sweetleftfoot
Club Captain
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
dazabhoy67
11 Sep 2017, 03:10 PM
CM1975
11 Sep 2017, 03:01 PM
Pedro should call SSB and ask a few probing questions of the that w@nk Regan.
Alison Conroy confirmed on twitter it won't be live.
Would've been very surprised if it was.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
paulfg42
Member Avatar
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Any inquiry would surely need to consider the circumstances behind the 5WA. What gave those individuals the authority to make decisions which have lasting implications for the Scottish game.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Celtic Football Club Discussion Forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply