Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Kerrydale Street. We hope you enjoy your visit.

You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use.

If you decide to register, please be aware that we don't accept email addresses from free web accounts like gmail, Hotmail, live.co.uk etc. Sorry, but almost all of the abuse and spam that we get is from free web accounts. The software on the forum will automatically block any requests using a free email account.

Upon Registration, you will be given access to all our varied Forums, and you will be expected to comply with our fairly stringent Rules and Regulations. Meantime, enjoy your visit

If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The Board - general discussion (including Res 12); notes from the AGM
Topic Started: 15 Jul 2014, 12:03 AM (1,414,616 Views)
He Cometh
First name on the team-sheet
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:32 PM
How do the media know the contents of the correspondence between the Res12 lawyers and UEFA?
Hand delivered to a compliant media from Ibrox.

They also had to put a submission in and would have been copied into any emails being sent.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
boozebhoy
Member Avatar
First-team captain
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:37 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:32 PM
How do the media know the contents of the correspondence between the Res12 lawyers and UEFA?
Hand delivered to a compliant media from Ibrox.

They also had to put a submission in and would have been copied into any emails being sent.
Doesn't mention an e-mail but an actual letter. Correspondence of this nature would be by formal letter not e-mail.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
tenerifetim
Member Avatar
Considering retirement
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:32 PM
How do the media know the contents of the correspondence between the Res12 lawyers and UEFA?
They don't appear to have sight of the reply to Requisitioners hence @stvGrant' s demand that they publish yet he refuses to publish his emails & questions to UEFA ! :ffs:
I'm sure the SMSM have a sniff of the context and don't like it , hence the squirrels being released ! :rubeyes:
There's a bit more mileage in this yet though some of the cryptic clues are frustrating ! :twitch:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
He Cometh
First name on the team-sheet
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:41 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:37 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:32 PM
How do the media know the contents of the correspondence between the Res12 lawyers and UEFA?
Hand delivered to a compliant media from Ibrox.

They also had to put a submission in and would have been copied into any emails being sent.
Doesn't mention an e-mail but an actual letter. Correspondence of this nature would be by formal letter not e-mail.
Ok mate i'll rephrase it.

They would also have been sent a letter.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
boozebhoy
Member Avatar
First-team captain
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:50 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:41 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:37 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Doesn't mention an e-mail but an actual letter. Correspondence of this nature would be by formal letter not e-mail.
Ok mate i'll rephrase it.

They would also have been sent a letter.
No. Wouldn't have happened. Tenerife Tim's theory probably more accurate.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Hoops For Me All The Way
Member Avatar
You want equality? Consider if that person feels Equal.
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Wee Ed KTF
21 Jun 2016, 12:11 PM
mickydee67
21 Jun 2016, 10:27 AM
Me too. I think this is still live
:thumbsup:


http://www.celticquicknews.co.uk/resolution-12-the-letter-from-uefa-some-answers-more-questions/
Copied from CQN, for those who cannot access for whatever reason


Quote:
 
BY CQN MAGAZINE ON 21ST JUNE 2016 FOOTBALL MATTERS, LATEST NEWS
RESOLUTION 12 is all about what happened during season 2011/2012 with regard to the administration and monitoring of UEFA licenses in Scotland.

It is the football and governance topic some want to ignore, deflect and cover up at all costs. It makes them uncomfortable. It asks awkward questions, some of which have now been answered by UEFA in a formal letter addressed to solicitors acting for a group of Celtic shareholders.

Had the letter been addressed to a football association or indeed a member club then there would have been no need to take the counter measures we saw yesterday.

Today Resolution 12 is in the news. Apparently it is over. Apparently it was about Rangers. It’s not and it wasn’t.

Resolution 12 is about the SFA administration of licensing (as we should all know by now). The same friends in Glasgow media circles have been used to try to spike what is coming. Jaws would have been on the floor when Uefa’s letter was read. The PR panic button would have been sounded.

Damage limitation was the order of the day. They had no means of controlling or attempting to control those with the letter and with a right to reply to UEFA.

Yesterday the Resolution 12 guys could have responded. They nearly did but it wasn’t the right time. They were helped by the reaction from a Celtic support, and indeed supporters of many other clubs, who are now seeing this stuff for what it is.

They have posed legal questions to legal people and have formally received answers which have led to further ongoing communication.

Imagine for a moment that the following has been established, so far, with more to come:

If UEFA have refused to back Stewart Regan’s formal stance to Celtic.

If UEFA contradicted Regan’s publicly stated definition of the duties of the SFA.

If UEFA have failed to endorse the SFA’s stance on being unable to report.

If UEFA refused to say that Rangers were compliant at 30th June and 30th September and instead identify compliance requirements but stopped short of saying they complied.

If UEFA have stated clearly that there is an OLD CLUB and a NEW CLUB and that the two are separate legal and footballing entities!

If UEFA have stated clearly that during season 2011 Rangers did not comply with the necessary criteria to hold a UEFA licence.

If UEFA have stated clearly that during season 2011 Rangers were non-compliant with UEFA licensing requirements, but refuse to identify, when the non-compliance was identified, when the SFA reported they were non-compliant, and merely sum up by saying they were not granted a licence for season 2012/2013?

Imagine all that! In ONE letter from UEFA! The first, we suspect, of many.

What a story that would be!

Just remember, Persistence Beats Res12tance!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
He Cometh
First name on the team-sheet
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:53 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:50 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:41 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Ok mate i'll rephrase it.

They would also have been sent a letter.
No. Wouldn't have happened. Tenerife Tim's theory probably more accurate.
Ok bud. .i'll bow to your knowledge on this :thumbsup:
Edited by He Cometh, 21 Jun 2016, 04:00 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
greenjedi
Member Avatar
Jedi Master
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:50 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:41 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:37 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Doesn't mention an e-mail but an actual letter. Correspondence of this nature would be by formal letter not e-mail.
Ok mate i'll rephrase it.

They would also have been sent a letter.
The complaint was about them or the old club with a similar name. the complaint was about the SFA
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
idyllwild


boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:53 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:50 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:41 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Ok mate i'll rephrase it.

They would also have been sent a letter.
No. Wouldn't have happened. Tenerife Tim's theory probably more accurate.
Just to be clear, He Cometh seems to be saying that the Huns would've been kept updated on this issue given their quasi-involvement.

Are you saying that the Huns wouldn't have received any communications on it? :ponder:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
He Cometh
First name on the team-sheet
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
greenjedi
21 Jun 2016, 04:02 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:50 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:41 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Ok mate i'll rephrase it.

They would also have been sent a letter.
The complaint was about them or the old club with a similar name. the complaint was about the SFA
They were asked for (and sent) a submission.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
greenjedi
Member Avatar
Jedi Master
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 04:09 PM
greenjedi
21 Jun 2016, 04:02 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:50 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
The complaint was about them or the old club with a similar name. the complaint was about the SFA
They were asked for (and sent) a submission.
Why would you ask a company about another companies tax records. So who asked, the SFA or UEFA?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
He Cometh
First name on the team-sheet
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
greenjedi
21 Jun 2016, 04:13 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 04:09 PM
greenjedi
21 Jun 2016, 04:02 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
They were asked for (and sent) a submission.
Why would you ask a company about another companies tax records. So who asked, the SFA or UEFA?
UEFA. .I don't know what exactly they were asked for but they were part of the process and therefor would have been informed on the outcome.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
idyllwild


greenjedi
21 Jun 2016, 04:13 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 04:09 PM
greenjedi
21 Jun 2016, 04:02 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
They were asked for (and sent) a submission.
Why would you ask a company about another companies tax records. So who asked, the SFA or UEFA?
To quote CQN, this is about licensing. That's the direct issue.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
boozebhoy
Member Avatar
First-team captain
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
idyllwild
21 Jun 2016, 04:08 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:53 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:50 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
No. Wouldn't have happened. Tenerife Tim's theory probably more accurate.
Just to be clear, He Cometh seems to be saying that the Huns would've been kept updated on this issue given their quasi-involvement.

Are you saying that the Huns wouldn't have received any communications on it? :ponder:
No. Saying they wouldn't have received the correspondence between Res12 Lawyers and UEFA. They (UEFA) may have written to Newco outlining they (UEFA) were corresponding with other parties regarding SFA licensing for european competition 2011/12.

But don't buy the idea a copy of UEFA's reply to Res12 lawyers would have been sent to Ibrox and then a Level5 PR conclave, featuring the Grant guy from STV, gathered to deflect the contents of the letter.

I do however believe the press are desperate for this to go away and nothing would surprise me. Just think its better for the credibility of the Res12 people if conspiracies are dismissed and known facts are the currency. And to be fair, the Res12 people have been doing this.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
MBhoy1888
Member Avatar
Getting on a bit
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 04:24 PM
idyllwild
21 Jun 2016, 04:08 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:53 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Just to be clear, He Cometh seems to be saying that the Huns would've been kept updated on this issue given their quasi-involvement.

Are you saying that the Huns wouldn't have received any communications on it? :ponder:
No. Saying they wouldn't have received the correspondence between Res12 Lawyers and UEFA. They (UEFA) may have written to Newco outlining they (UEFA) were corresponding with other parties regarding SFA licensing for european competition 2011/12.

But don't buy the idea a copy of UEFA's reply to Res12 lawyers would have been sent to Ibrox and then a Level5 PR conclave, featuring the Grant guy from STV, gathered to deflect the contents of the letter.

I do however believe the press are desperate for this to go away and nothing would surprise me. Just think its better for the credibility of the Res12 people if conspiracies are dismissed and known facts are the currency. And to be fair, the Res12 people have been doing this.
This is not the KDS (or Celtic) way. :arrr:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
He Cometh
First name on the team-sheet
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 04:24 PM
idyllwild
21 Jun 2016, 04:08 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:53 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Just to be clear, He Cometh seems to be saying that the Huns would've been kept updated on this issue given their quasi-involvement.

Are you saying that the Huns wouldn't have received any communications on it? :ponder:
No. Saying they wouldn't have received the correspondence between Res12 Lawyers and UEFA. They (UEFA) may have written to Newco outlining they (UEFA) were corresponding with other parties regarding SFA licensing for european competition 2011/12.

But don't buy the idea a copy of UEFA's reply to Res12 lawyers would have been sent to Ibrox and then a Level5 PR conclave, featuring the Grant guy from STV, gathered to deflect the contents of the letter.

I do however believe the press are desperate for this to go away and nothing would surprise me. Just think its better for the credibility of the Res12 people if conspiracies are dismissed and known facts are the currency. And to be fair, the Res12 people have been doing this.
They maybe didn't receive the exact letter but they would have received their own letter containing UEFA's conclusions on the matter.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
boozebhoy
Member Avatar
First-team captain
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 04:35 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 04:24 PM
idyllwild
21 Jun 2016, 04:08 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
No. Saying they wouldn't have received the correspondence between Res12 Lawyers and UEFA. They (UEFA) may have written to Newco outlining they (UEFA) were corresponding with other parties regarding SFA licensing for european competition 2011/12.

But don't buy the idea a copy of UEFA's reply to Res12 lawyers would have been sent to Ibrox and then a Level5 PR conclave, featuring the Grant guy from STV, gathered to deflect the contents of the letter.

I do however believe the press are desperate for this to go away and nothing would surprise me. Just think its better for the credibility of the Res12 people if conspiracies are dismissed and known facts are the currency. And to be fair, the Res12 people have been doing this.
They maybe didn't receive the exact letter but they would have received their own letter containing UEFA's conclusions on the matter.
And they (UEFA) would have told the Res12 lawyers they were doing this?
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
He Cometh
First name on the team-sheet
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
idyllwild
21 Jun 2016, 04:08 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 03:53 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 03:50 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
No. Wouldn't have happened. Tenerife Tim's theory probably more accurate.
Just to be clear, He Cometh seems to be saying that the Huns would've been kept updated on this issue given their quasi-involvement.

Are you saying that the Huns wouldn't have received any communications on it? :ponder:
That's exactly what i'm saying mate.

It's fairly obvious that everyone who had been asked to submit evidence etc and who were involved in the whole situation would then be notified of UEFA's conclusions on the matter.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
He Cometh
First name on the team-sheet
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 04:38 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 04:35 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 04:24 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
They maybe didn't receive the exact letter but they would have received their own letter containing UEFA's conclusions on the matter.
And they (UEFA) would have told the Res12 lawyers they were doing this?
Do you think a club who were asked for a submission on the issue (and submitted it) would not then be informed by UEFA on their conclusions?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
CHR15
Member Avatar
I'll take 2 of those feckin sheep giraffes please
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 04:41 PM
boozebhoy
21 Jun 2016, 04:38 PM
He Cometh
21 Jun 2016, 04:35 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
And they (UEFA) would have told the Res12 lawyers they were doing this?
Do you think a club who were asked for a submission on the issue (and submitted it) would not then be informed by UEFA on their conclusions?
It sorta throws doubt on the implicit claims of a new club in the CQN comments earlier if the so-called new club were asked for submissions does it not? Unless it was under the 'SFA membership' umbrella
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Celtic Football Club Discussion Forum · Next Topic »
Add Reply