|
The Board - general discussion (including Res 12); notes from the AGM
|
|
Topic Started: 15 Jul 2014, 12:03 AM (1,414,635 Views)
|
|
Lobey Dosser
|
7 Jun 2016, 12:23 PM
Post #7741
|
- Posts:
- 7,450
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #3,394
- Joined:
- 17 March 2006
|
- hoophoophooray
- 7 Jun 2016, 08:43 AM
- tocce 1973
- 6 Jun 2016, 08:02 PM
- Chronic town
- 6 Jun 2016, 04:36 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
That would be nice, we can always live in hope.
Unless, of course, their intervention is to ban SPFL clubs from European competition Why would that be an appropriate punishment ?
|
|
|
| |
|
Fearghas
|
7 Jun 2016, 03:13 PM
Post #7742
|
- Posts:
- 2,647
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #34,269
- Joined:
- 4 July 2015
- Favourite all-time player
- Henke
- Twitter Name
- Fearghas73
|
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 12:23 PM
- hoophoophooray
- 7 Jun 2016, 08:43 AM
- tocce 1973
- 6 Jun 2016, 08:02 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Unless, of course, their intervention is to ban SPFL clubs from European competition
Why would that be an appropriate punishment ? it's uefa we're talking about
|
|
|
| |
|
henrikisgod
|
7 Jun 2016, 04:01 PM
Post #7743
|
- Posts:
- 8,089
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #22,658
- Joined:
- 25 November 2008
- Favourite all-time player
- henrik larsson
|
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 12:23 PM
- hoophoophooray
- 7 Jun 2016, 08:43 AM
- tocce 1973
- 6 Jun 2016, 08:02 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Unless, of course, their intervention is to ban SPFL clubs from European competition
Why would that be an appropriate punishment ? It's the SFA who have failed to apply UEFA rules so the punishment would be for the Association as a whole It's a shampooe state of affairs but it's the way UEFA work
|
|
|
| |
|
Lobey Dosser
|
7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
Post #7744
|
- Posts:
- 7,450
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #3,394
- Joined:
- 17 March 2006
|
- henrikisgod
- 7 Jun 2016, 04:01 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 12:23 PM
- hoophoophooray
- 7 Jun 2016, 08:43 AM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Why would that be an appropriate punishment ?
It's the SFA who have failed to apply UEFA rules so the punishment would be for the Association as a whole It's a shampooe state of affairs but it's the way UEFA work The SFA carried out it's declared process, in line with UEFA regs, Regan confirmed this last week . If a single club deliberately lied to them about its financial situation and gained an advantage as a result of those lies, how is the SFA culpable? In that case why would the SFA and all the other clubs be guilty of anything ?
|
|
|
| |
|
greenjedi
|
7 Jun 2016, 05:36 PM
Post #7745
|
- Posts:
- 17,958
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #22
- Joined:
- 31 August 2004
- Favourite all-time player
- Paul McStay
- Twitter Name
- @greenjedi8
|
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
- henrikisgod
- 7 Jun 2016, 04:01 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 12:23 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
It's the SFA who have failed to apply UEFA rules so the punishment would be for the Association as a whole It's a shampooe state of affairs but it's the way UEFA work
The SFA carried out it's declared process, in line with UEFA regs, Regan confirmed this last week . If a single club deliberately lied to them about its financial situation and gained an advantage as a result of those lies, how is the SFA culpable? In that case why would the SFA and all the other clubs be guilty of anything ? Clubs had to prove* they didn't owe any tax. Rangers couldn't do that, yet still got the licence.
* I'm guessing proof would be in the form of a letter from HMRC saying there was nothing outstanding, but I thats me just guessing
|
|
|
| |
|
Quiet Assasin
|
7 Jun 2016, 06:03 PM
Post #7746
|
..for the maintenance of dinner tables for the children and the unemployed
- Posts:
- 42,247
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #24,627
- Joined:
- 18 October 2009
- Favourite all-time player
- 'The Assailant'
|
- greenjedi
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:36 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
- henrikisgod
- 7 Jun 2016, 04:01 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
The SFA carried out it's declared process, in line with UEFA regs, Regan confirmed this last week . If a single club deliberately lied to them about its financial situation and gained an advantage as a result of those lies, how is the SFA culpable? In that case why would the SFA and all the other clubs be guilty of anything ?
Clubs had to prove* they didn't owe any tax. Rangers couldn't do that, yet still got the licence. * I'm guessing proof would be in the form of a letter from HMRC saying there was nothing outstanding, but I thats me just guessing Do you actually have to prove it? Most regulators work on a self declaration system. It's up to the person making the declaration to tell the truth. The SFA can't open up Rangers or anyway else's books to get into what they owe to who. I'm guessing if the shampoo hits the fan the SFA would be quick to chuck the shame under the nearest bus going.
|
|
|
| |
|
Lobey Dosser
|
7 Jun 2016, 06:13 PM
Post #7747
|
- Posts:
- 7,450
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #3,394
- Joined:
- 17 March 2006
|
- Quiet Assasin
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:03 PM
- greenjedi
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:36 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Clubs had to prove* they didn't owe any tax. Rangers couldn't do that, yet still got the licence. * I'm guessing proof would be in the form of a letter from HMRC saying there was nothing outstanding, but I thats me just guessing
Do you actually have to prove it? Most regulators work on a self declaration system. It's up to the person making the declaration to tell the truth. The SFA can't open up Rangers or anyway else's books to get into what they owe to who. I'm guessing if the shampoo hits the fan the SFA would be quick to chuck the shame under the nearest bus going. Agreed
|
|
|
| |
|
Wanyerma
|
7 Jun 2016, 06:17 PM
Post #7748
|
- Posts:
- 8,374
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #29,294
- Joined:
- 22 August 2011
- Favourite all-time player
- Henrik
|
- Quiet Assasin
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:03 PM
- greenjedi
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:36 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Clubs had to prove* they didn't owe any tax. Rangers couldn't do that, yet still got the licence. * I'm guessing proof would be in the form of a letter from HMRC saying there was nothing outstanding, but I thats me just guessing
Do you actually have to prove it? Most regulators work on a self declaration system. It's up to the person making the declaration to tell the truth. The SFA can't open up Rangers or anyway else's books to get into what they owe to who. I'm guessing if the shampoo hits the fan the SFA would be quick to chuck the shame under the nearest bus going. Yep, SFA pretty much threw Rangers under a bus last week. But they were well able to do so due to the nature of the self-declaration system.
The problem for Sevco is that some responsible for corporate governance of Rangers at the time are now running Sevco. That they were allowed to is a bigger failing of the SFA imo.
|
|
|
| |
|
kellybhoy
|
7 Jun 2016, 06:18 PM
Post #7749
|
- Posts:
- 12,084
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #3,529
- Joined:
- 4 April 2006
|
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
- henrikisgod
- 7 Jun 2016, 04:01 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 12:23 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
It's the SFA who have failed to apply UEFA rules so the punishment would be for the Association as a whole It's a shampooe state of affairs but it's the way UEFA work
The SFA carried out it's declared process, in line with UEFA regs, Regan confirmed this last week . If a single club deliberately lied to them about its financial situation and gained an advantage as a result of those lies, how is the SFA culpable? In that case why would the SFA and all the other clubs be guilty of anything ? But how can you punish a club (or, sorry company) that is now in liquidation?
|
|
|
| |
|
Lobey Dosser
|
7 Jun 2016, 06:20 PM
Post #7750
|
- Posts:
- 7,450
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #3,394
- Joined:
- 17 March 2006
|
- kellybhoy
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:18 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
- henrikisgod
- 7 Jun 2016, 04:01 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
The SFA carried out it's declared process, in line with UEFA regs, Regan confirmed this last week . If a single club deliberately lied to them about its financial situation and gained an advantage as a result of those lies, how is the SFA culpable? In that case why would the SFA and all the other clubs be guilty of anything ?
But how can you punish a club (or, sorry company) that is now in liquidation? I couldn't possibly comment
|
|
|
| |
|
VerdeYBlanco
|
7 Jun 2016, 06:20 PM
Post #7751
|
- Posts:
- 7,457
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #33,335
- Joined:
- 22 February 2014
- Favourite all-time player
- Danny McGrain
|
- kellybhoy
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:18 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
- henrikisgod
- 7 Jun 2016, 04:01 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
The SFA carried out it's declared process, in line with UEFA regs, Regan confirmed this last week . If a single club deliberately lied to them about its financial situation and gained an advantage as a result of those lies, how is the SFA culpable? In that case why would the SFA and all the other clubs be guilty of anything ?
But how can you punish a club (or, sorry company) that is now in liquidation? Did the bastard incarnation not agree to take on all football debts and liabilities?
|
|
|
| |
|
Lobey Dosser
|
7 Jun 2016, 06:59 PM
Post #7752
|
- Posts:
- 7,450
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #3,394
- Joined:
- 17 March 2006
|
- VerdeYBlanco
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:20 PM
- kellybhoy
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:18 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
But how can you punish a club (or, sorry company) that is now in liquidation?
Did the bastard incarnation not agree to take on all football debts and liabilities? See above post.
|
|
|
| |
|
Kingslim
|
7 Jun 2016, 07:11 PM
Post #7753
|
- Posts:
- 17,986
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #33,465
- Joined:
- 1 May 2014
- Favourite all-time player
- Paul McStay
|
- jcwelsh
- 6 Jun 2016, 12:18 AM
I wouldn’t say I was atoll an expert on the issue of resolution 12, but when the former Rangers entered into the champion’s league in the year 2011, they were NOT in debt to anyone, and there is no record in any accountancy level to show otherwise.
Yes they ran out of money due to not qualifying for the champion’s league proper, but that was there downfall, nothing else and this will be proven.
Someone is losing a lot of money pushing this to its limit and I believe there are people jumping on the bandwagon to the strength on thinking someone knows what they are talking about.
The bigger issue in my humble opinion is that The Rangers are a new club who think they can slip back in where their old club left off and expect to continue on with the same traits.
I would also like to put it out there that anyone who turns up for the next media driven old firm game is condoning those traits, we have to be wise to tackle this cancer, we have played at castle grey scull before in front of venom and it did not make a difference. Don’t let The Ranger thinking it is over and that they are back, don’t give them a single penny and let’s see the message that sends out.
I mean, seriously do we really have people out there who call themselves Celtic supporters who are willing to hand over there hard earned cash to such a avaricious organisation.
Res 12 is small potatoes compared to the real problem.
Castle Greyskull is where He-Man lived. Snake Mountain is where Skeletor lived.
The amount of supporters who make a carrot of this is woeful.
|
|
|
| |
|
VerdeYBlanco
|
7 Jun 2016, 07:29 PM
Post #7754
|
- Posts:
- 7,457
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #33,335
- Joined:
- 22 February 2014
- Favourite all-time player
- Danny McGrain
|
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:59 PM
- VerdeYBlanco
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:20 PM
- kellybhoy
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:18 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Did the bastard incarnation not agree to take on all football debts and liabilities?
See above post. Which one
|
|
|
| |
|
the-gaffer606
|
7 Jun 2016, 07:38 PM
Post #7755
|
- Posts:
- 2,594
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #29,983
- Joined:
- 5 December 2011
- Favourite all-time player
- 1st Henrik Larsson....2nd Pierre Van Hooijdonk
|
- Kingslim
- 7 Jun 2016, 07:11 PM
- jcwelsh
- 6 Jun 2016, 12:18 AM
I wouldn’t say I was atoll an expert on the issue of resolution 12, but when the former Rangers entered into the champion’s league in the year 2011, they were NOT in debt to anyone, and there is no record in any accountancy level to show otherwise.
Yes they ran out of money due to not qualifying for the champion’s league proper, but that was there downfall, nothing else and this will be proven.
Someone is losing a lot of money pushing this to its limit and I believe there are people jumping on the bandwagon to the strength on thinking someone knows what they are talking about.
The bigger issue in my humble opinion is that The Rangers are a new club who think they can slip back in where their old club left off and expect to continue on with the same traits.
I would also like to put it out there that anyone who turns up for the next media driven old firm game is condoning those traits, we have to be wise to tackle this cancer, we have played at castle grey scull before in front of venom and it did not make a difference. Don’t let The Ranger thinking it is over and that they are back, don’t give them a single penny and let’s see the message that sends out.
I mean, seriously do we really have people out there who call themselves Celtic supporters who are willing to hand over there hard earned cash to such a avaricious organisation.
Res 12 is small potatoes compared to the real problem. Castle Greyskull is where He-Man lived. Snake Mountain is where Skeletor lived. The amount of supporters who make a carrot of this is woeful. You do get that its from a very early Only an Excuse sketch don't you? Before the TV shows, when they just did wee tapes for the radio
Rangers were from Castle Greyskull because they were "the GRANDmasters of the Universe"
It's a play on words slagging the Huns for being masons
|
|
|
| |
|
Sunny Jim Young
|
7 Jun 2016, 08:08 PM
Post #7756
|
- Posts:
- 7,297
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #3,601
- Joined:
- 14 April 2006
- Favourite all-time player
- Bobby Lennox
|
- Quiet Assasin
- 7 Jun 2016, 06:03 PM
- greenjedi
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:36 PM
- Lobey Dosser
- 7 Jun 2016, 05:05 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Clubs had to prove* they didn't owe any tax. Rangers couldn't do that, yet still got the licence. * I'm guessing proof would be in the form of a letter from HMRC saying there was nothing outstanding, but I thats me just guessing
Do you actually have to prove it? Most regulators work on a self declaration system. It's up to the person making the declaration to tell the truth. The SFA can't open up Rangers or anyway else's books to get into what they owe to who. I'm guessing if the shampoo hits the fan the SFA would be quick to chuck the shame under the nearest bus going. That's precisely how regulation usually works.
I'm pretty sure there is an obligation on clubs to do something like "act in the utmost good faith"
So the SFA shouldn't be criticised if they were misled by Rangers.
Where they could and should be criticised would be if they came across strong evidence that they had been misled and failed to act upon it.
And if they then compounded that by declaring that two members of the Board that misled them were fit and proper then they deserve everything that's coming to them.
|
|
|
| |
|
Kingslim
|
7 Jun 2016, 11:03 PM
Post #7757
|
- Posts:
- 17,986
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #33,465
- Joined:
- 1 May 2014
- Favourite all-time player
- Paul McStay
|
- the-gaffer606
- 7 Jun 2016, 07:38 PM
- Kingslim
- 7 Jun 2016, 07:11 PM
- jcwelsh
- 6 Jun 2016, 12:18 AM
I wouldn’t say I was atoll an expert on the issue of resolution 12, but when the former Rangers entered into the champion’s league in the year 2011, they were NOT in debt to anyone, and there is no record in any accountancy level to show otherwise.
Yes they ran out of money due to not qualifying for the champion’s league proper, but that was there downfall, nothing else and this will be proven.
Someone is losing a lot of money pushing this to its limit and I believe there are people jumping on the bandwagon to the strength on thinking someone knows what they are talking about.
The bigger issue in my humble opinion is that The Rangers are a new club who think they can slip back in where their old club left off and expect to continue on with the same traits.
I would also like to put it out there that anyone who turns up for the next media driven old firm game is condoning those traits, we have to be wise to tackle this cancer, we have played at castle grey scull before in front of venom and it did not make a difference. Don’t let The Ranger thinking it is over and that they are back, don’t give them a single penny and let’s see the message that sends out.
I mean, seriously do we really have people out there who call themselves Celtic supporters who are willing to hand over there hard earned cash to such a avaricious organisation.
Res 12 is small potatoes compared to the real problem. Castle Greyskull is where He-Man lived. Snake Mountain is where Skeletor lived. The amount of supporters who make a carrot of this is woeful.
You do get that its from a very early Only an Excuse sketch don't you? Before the TV shows, when they just did wee tapes for the radio Rangers were from Castle Greyskull because they were "the GRANDmasters of the Universe" It's a play on words slagging the Huns for being masons Everyday is a school day
|
|
|
| |
|
Kingslim
|
7 Jun 2016, 11:07 PM
Post #7758
|
- Posts:
- 17,986
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #33,465
- Joined:
- 1 May 2014
- Favourite all-time player
- Paul McStay
|
Cqn saying club will put out statement this week re r12
|
|
|
| |
|
greenjedi
|
8 Jun 2016, 09:32 AM
Post #7759
|
- Posts:
- 17,958
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #22
- Joined:
- 31 August 2004
- Favourite all-time player
- Paul McStay
- Twitter Name
- @greenjedi8
|
- Kingslim
- 7 Jun 2016, 11:07 PM
Cqn saying club will put out statement this week re r12 I can see them not bothering, after all everybody has bought season books now!
|
|
|
| |
|
Lubo The Magician
|
8 Jun 2016, 09:35 AM
Post #7760
|
The Devil's right hand...
- Posts:
- 17,687
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #1,147
- Joined:
- 9 June 2005
|
- greenjedi
- 8 Jun 2016, 09:32 AM
- Kingslim
- 7 Jun 2016, 11:07 PM
Cqn saying club will put out statement this week re r12
I can see them not bothering, after all everybody has bought season books now! Isn't Paul a "good friend" of the Board (Lawwell)
I doubt very much CQN would say there will be a statement unless the Board have told him so directly.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|