| Welcome to Kerrydale Street. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you decide to register, please be aware that we don't accept email addresses from free web accounts like gmail, Hotmail, live.co.uk etc. Sorry, but almost all of the abuse and spam that we get is from free web accounts. The software on the forum will automatically block any requests using a free email account. Upon Registration, you will be given access to all our varied Forums, and you will be expected to comply with our fairly stringent Rules and Regulations. Meantime, enjoy your visit If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Man City fail in Terry Bid; Non-'tic | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: 3 Jul 2009, 02:26 PM (631 Views) | |
| A N Other | 3 Jul 2009, 02:26 PM Post #1 |
Wibble
  ![]](http://209.85.122.87/static/1/pip_r.png)
|
Linky Chelsea have confirmed that they have rejected a second offer from Manchester City for captain John Terry. Money-rich City made an unsuccessful bid for the England skipper last season and they have again failed in their attempts to bring the centre-back to Eastlands. The size of the offer has not been revealed, but Chelsea insist that Terry is not for sale and that the 28-year-old is totally committed to the cause at Stamford Bridge. A statement on the club's official website said: "We can confirm we have completely rejected an offer from Manchester City for John Terry. "It was made clear to City, for a second time following an approach last season, that we would not entertain any conversation on the subject. "At the time John also reiterated his total commitment to Chelsea. "We would like to make it clear, and will not do so again, that John is not for sale." Thoughts? Would be a good player for Citeh, big loss for Chelsea, no big shock they rejected it. Could anyone see Terry go there regardless of the cash? |
 |
 
|
| The Maestro | 3 Jul 2009, 02:33 PM Post #2 |
Skateaway
|
Chelsea and City are massive clubs. |
|
|
|
| A N Other | 3 Jul 2009, 02:38 PM Post #3 |
|
Wibble
|
Fixed that for you. 
|
|
|
|
| Fall_Out_Bhoy | 3 Jul 2009, 02:42 PM Post #4 |
Cheer up FFS
|
I heard it was something like £118m?  Can anyone confirm? |
|
|
|
| area109 | 3 Jul 2009, 02:43 PM Post #5 |
|
First-team captain
|
£30m is a lot of money for a 28 year old center half. Just shows the financial power Chelski still have to be able to turn down this bid ! Always thought Carvalho the better of the two and i see he is available for £8mish Man City could do a lot worse than him. Why the Arabs didn't just go out and buy Manu baffles me  No matter how much moeny you throw at city Manu will always be the No1 in Engerlund bit like us in Scottyland 
|
|
|
|
| jamieebhoy | 3 Jul 2009, 02:45 PM Post #6 |
-
|
Naaa. £30m-ish I think |
|
|
|
| jamieebhoy | 3 Jul 2009, 02:46 PM Post #7 |
|
-
|
Me too
|
|
|
|
| Fall_Out_Bhoy | 3 Jul 2009, 02:46 PM Post #8 |
|
Cheer up FFS
|
A fellow poster pulling my leg then  Cheers
|
|
|
|
| jacktenoff | 3 Jul 2009, 02:53 PM Post #9 |
I like where this is goin'! Giggidy, giggidy, gig-gi-dy!
|
this whole thing is just becoming a huge cock waving excercise. |
|
|
|
| Fall_Out_Bhoy | 3 Jul 2009, 03:14 PM Post #10 |
|
Cheer up FFS
|
I can't wait until it becomes so stupid that in about 5 years we get offered £250m from Norwich for Lee Naylor. This is becoming a joke.
|
|
|
|
| brazilbhoy | 3 Jul 2009, 03:15 PM Post #11 |
First-team captain
|
no they're not! They just have mega rich owners. They have poorer stadiums than Celtic and a smaller support. Chelsea are a huge club in revenue terms (EPL and CL) Man City hav nothing to boast about, they just throw money at players and have been behind celtic in turnover for the last 10 years (2009 celtic disappeared off the radar). Man Utd, Liverpool and Arsenal are well in front of Man City on that score |
|
|
|
| Bawman | 3 Jul 2009, 03:57 PM Post #12 |
Class is permanent
|
Pump all that money intae the SPL and St Mirren are a "massive" club |
|
|
|
| A N Other | 3 Jul 2009, 03:59 PM Post #13 |
|
Wibble
|
If anyone ever thinks Man City are a massive club, I suggest you google what trophies they won to get the 3 stars above their crest. |
|
|
|
| paddygarcia | 3 Jul 2009, 04:15 PM Post #14 |
Legend.
|
If any smug Celtic fans think Man City are not a massive club I suggest they google their gates in the dark days and then do a quick comparison to Celtic's gates in the early 90's. Man City are a massive club. IfYouKnowYourHistoryCSC. |
|
|
|
| Ben Kenobi | 3 Jul 2009, 04:17 PM Post #15 |
She got it all goin' on
|
To be fair, it's a pretty good way to get some exercise. |
|
|
|
| Jaemi | 3 Jul 2009, 04:20 PM Post #16 |
Club Captain
|
Non-tic? |
|
|
|
| fatboab | 3 Jul 2009, 04:34 PM Post #17 |
Monster? Nah...Driver and a 5 Iron.
|
meh...they're not even the biggest club in Manchester. 
|
|
|
|
| The Maestro | 3 Jul 2009, 05:40 PM Post #18 |
|
Skateaway
|
I forgot to put  after my post. |
|
|
|
| spud2008 | 3 Jul 2009, 11:12 PM Post #19 |
First-team captain
|
why is everyone who are winning the Champions League and have lots of money always compared with Celtic? |
|
|
|
| The Maestro | 3 Jul 2009, 11:18 PM Post #20 |
|
Skateaway
|
According to the BBC Football site City want a £10m ''development fee'' for Daniel Sturridge cause he is under 23 and Chelsea have offered £3m...perhaps the Owen deal isn't as bad as folk think it will be for Utd... |
|
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Celtic Football Club Discussion Forum · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
8:32 AM Sep 7
