|
The All New Sevco Back in Yer Bin Thread; Taking out the trash
|
|
Topic Started: 29 Apr 2018, 04:24 PM (2,086,498 Views)
|
|
spartacusthethird
|
9 Jul 2018, 03:51 PM
Post #10441
|
Dance as if no-ones watching, sing as if no-ones listening and live every day as if it was your last
- Posts:
- 3,213
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #31,616
- Joined:
- 30 August 2012
- Favourite all-time player
- King of Kings
|
eff me, just eff, eff me.
The DR have really gone total mandarin
|
|
|
| |
|
dazabhoy67
|
9 Jul 2018, 03:52 PM
Post #10442
|
Off treasure hunting in Holland
- Posts:
- 18,315
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #26,754
- Joined:
- 17 August 2010
- Favourite all-time player
- Henrik Larsson
|
- Timmaaaaaaay
- 9 Jul 2018, 10:59 AM
They definitely can't buy their new tops? I seen a knuckledragger in braehead yesterday wearing the mandarin Hummel top. They're all coming out from under their rocks now
There was fakes from Turkey kicking about a few weeks ago and loads of huns went mad for them.
Might have been the fake orange one you seen, looks similar to the new orange one.
|
|
|
| |
|
Wailer
|
9 Jul 2018, 04:05 PM
Post #10443
|
- Posts:
- 57,396
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #625
- Joined:
- 9 February 2005
- Favourite all-time player
- Larsson
|
- spartacusthethird
- 9 Jul 2018, 03:51 PM
eff me, just eff, eff me.
The DR have really gone total mandarin
Hotline = some zoomer has called / written in. They've printed it though.
|
|
|
| |
|
SheffBhoy
|
9 Jul 2018, 04:10 PM
Post #10444
|
- Posts:
- 189
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #32,871
- Joined:
- 2 September 2013
- Favourite all-time player
- McGrain, McStay, Larsson
|
- Quiet Assasin
- 9 Jul 2018, 12:53 PM
- Ziggybhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 12:42 PM
- IndianaBhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 11:56 AM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Teletext is the product. Ceefax was the "brand" .... I think. Just as Oracle was the "brand" for independent television. Ceefax for the BBC, Oracle for ITV and C4..
I miss Bamboozle Bamboozle! Thought I was the only one that remembered that. Think I vaguely remember the same names appearing each week....
|
|
|
| |
|
Gothamcelt
|
9 Jul 2018, 04:48 PM
Post #10445
|
Retired and now a BT Sports pundit
- Posts:
- 10,924
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #26,222
- Joined:
- 12 June 2010
- Favourite all-time player
- Sir Kenny Dalglish
|
Chris Jack with his rallying call to other fans of other clubs to get involved with rangers moan.
Chris Jack: Questions over Murdoch MacLennan are key for all clubs and not just Rangers
Spoiler: click to toggle Christopher Jack @Chris_Jack89 Group Senior Sports Writer THINGS are rarely black and white in the world of Scottish football and when it comes to Murdoch MacLennan it isn’t a case of blue and green. Rangers may be leading the calls for MacLennan’s head due to his business links with two Celtic powerbrokers but the issues over his position should be looked at by clubs across the country. When Ibrox chairman Dave King called for Gary Hughes, the then non-executive director of the Scottish FA, to be suspended, supporters of other sides could have been forgiven for shrugging their shoulders. The comments that Hughes made in a magazine interview in 2006 - in which he labelled Rangers fans ‘the great unwashed’ - angered the Light Blue legions and King. Weeks later, Hughes did not seek re-election to the Hampden board as he left his position after three years. That didn’t completely placate Rangers, however, and in a statement they called for a review of the SFA’s procedures and a probe into whether Hughes was party to any discussions regarding the Notice of Complaint in relation to their 2011/12 UEFA licence. That battle is very much between Ibrox and Hampden but the latest fight that King has taken up has consequences across the country and leagues. It is one that he has fought alone in public so far, however. Where Rangers have led, no others have followed as shots have been launched back and forth with no sign of being intercepted by friendly fire, or otherwise, from elsewhere. King has now shifted his crosshairs along the Sixth Floor at the National Stadium and MacLennan, the chairman of the SPFL, is firmly in his sights over his appointment to the board of Independent News and Media, a Dublin-based firm where Dermot Desmond and Denis O’Brien are influential shareholders. The SPFL have refused Rangers’ request for an independent investigation into MacLennan’s links with INM and the Ibrox board have now called for him to be removed from office at Hampden. In response, a spokesperson for the SPFL said: “We note the contents of Rangers’ latest press release. The board has already made its strong and overwhelming support for the chairman very clear and we consider the matter closed.” Read more: Rangers set to clinch deal for Roma striker Umar Sadiq before Europa League clash That won’t be how Rangers see it, though, especially when Stewart Robertson, the Ibrox Managing Director, and MacLennan, weren’t involved in the board discussion. The potential for a conflict of interest here is clear, well to most observers at least. It comes down to who told what to who. Or not, in this case. If MacLennan informed Neil Doncaster, the SPFL chief executive, of his role with INM and highlighted the links with Desmond and O’Brien then his conscience is clear. If Doncaster was told, as he should have been, then those details had to be passed onto to the SPFL Board, of which Robertson is a member. If both of those processes had been followed completely to the letter, it is unfathomable to see how we could have reached this point and how Rangers could have become so irked. Whether there is a conflict of interest or not, and there is no suggestion whatsoever that MacLennan has acted improperly in his dealings, that is only one issue. The details of a Private Eye article on MacLennan have yet to be addressed by the man who was appointed in July but has rarely been seen in public. Perceptions cannot be altered but the SPFL had a chance to properly address Rangers’ concerns and didn’t take it. For some, their actions speak louder than their words. That could also be said about other clubs that have watched on as the statement war has unfolded and have chosen to stay in their bunkers rather than put their heads above the parapet in public. When the position of the SPFL chairman has been called into question, that issue becomes bigger than Rangers v Celtic or King v Doncaster. If clubs don’t show their colours, only grey areas will remain. http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/16340933.chris-jack-questions-over-murdoch-maclennan-are-key-for-all-clubs-and-not-just-rangers/
|
|
|
| |
|
Smiley
|
9 Jul 2018, 04:55 PM
Post #10446
|
Off treasure hunting in Holland
- Posts:
- 14,803
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #33,119
- Joined:
- 9 December 2013
|
It's one thing for Jack to be the ET's cheerleader for Rangers but that's a bit demented to be passed off as a newspaper article.
|
|
|
| |
|
littlegmbhoy
|
9 Jul 2018, 04:55 PM
Post #10447
|
- Posts:
- 4,261
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #34,917
- Joined:
- 20 June 2016
- Favourite all-time player
- Henke
|
- SheffBhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:10 PM
- Quiet Assasin
- 9 Jul 2018, 12:53 PM
- Ziggybhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 12:42 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
I miss Bamboozle
Bamboozle! Thought I was the only one that remembered that. Think I vaguely remember the same names appearing each week....
That was the quiz linked to the 4 colours on your remote???
Feck sakes memerios now of 20 years ago...if you got one worng you had to start again..think that was it?
|
|
|
| |
|
kellybhoy
|
9 Jul 2018, 04:56 PM
Post #10448
|
- Posts:
- 12,084
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #3,529
- Joined:
- 4 April 2006
|
- weebaldy
- 9 Jul 2018, 02:15 PM
- kellybhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 02:02 PM
- Ned Rise
- 9 Jul 2018, 07:12 AM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Aye, y're hilarious mate.
This has went a wee bit mental. It originally began on a serious note following the assault on a priest and the apparent lack of action from the authorities. It has now descended to a tit for tat about people having a pee and the whether its right to photograph them  As a previous poster has already said, the vast majority of us have all been desperate enough to have a pee where we shouldn't but please don't let this petty argument distract us from the seriousness of the assault on a priest by the low life scum I know. It's just the sight of those neaderthals lining up against the public library in full view of the cops that sickens me. Most people, decent people that is, will look for a spot out of the way, or behind a tree or something, not up against the wall of a public building where everyone, including kids, can see them. Someone suggested photographing them, and yer man got all indignant, so I was just reaction to his defence of these animals.
|
|
|
| |
|
Tam Haas
|
9 Jul 2018, 04:56 PM
Post #10449
|
- Posts:
- 4,396
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #24,655
- Joined:
- 23 October 2009
|
- Gothamcelt
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:48 PM
Chris Jack with his rallying call to other fans of other clubs to get involved with rangers moan. Chris Jack: Questions over Murdoch MacLennan are key for all clubs and not just RangersSpoiler: click to toggle Christopher Jack @Chris_Jack89 Group Senior Sports Writer THINGS are rarely black and white in the world of Scottish football and when it comes to Murdoch MacLennan it isn’t a case of blue and green. Rangers may be leading the calls for MacLennan’s head due to his business links with two Celtic powerbrokers but the issues over his position should be looked at by clubs across the country. When Ibrox chairman Dave King called for Gary Hughes, the then non-executive director of the Scottish FA, to be suspended, supporters of other sides could have been forgiven for shrugging their shoulders. The comments that Hughes made in a magazine interview in 2006 - in which he labelled Rangers fans ‘the great unwashed’ - angered the Light Blue legions and King. Weeks later, Hughes did not seek re-election to the Hampden board as he left his position after three years. That didn’t completely placate Rangers, however, and in a statement they called for a review of the SFA’s procedures and a probe into whether Hughes was party to any discussions regarding the Notice of Complaint in relation to their 2011/12 UEFA licence. That battle is very much between Ibrox and Hampden but the latest fight that King has taken up has consequences across the country and leagues. It is one that he has fought alone in public so far, however. Where Rangers have led, no others have followed as shots have been launched back and forth with no sign of being intercepted by friendly fire, or otherwise, from elsewhere. King has now shifted his crosshairs along the Sixth Floor at the National Stadium and MacLennan, the chairman of the SPFL, is firmly in his sights over his appointment to the board of Independent News and Media, a Dublin-based firm where Dermot Desmond and Denis O’Brien are influential shareholders. The SPFL have refused Rangers’ request for an independent investigation into MacLennan’s links with INM and the Ibrox board have now called for him to be removed from office at Hampden. In response, a spokesperson for the SPFL said: “We note the contents of Rangers’ latest press release. The board has already made its strong and overwhelming support for the chairman very clear and we consider the matter closed.” Read more: Rangers set to clinch deal for Roma striker Umar Sadiq before Europa League clash That won’t be how Rangers see it, though, especially when Stewart Robertson, the Ibrox Managing Director, and MacLennan, weren’t involved in the board discussion. The potential for a conflict of interest here is clear, well to most observers at least. It comes down to who told what to who. Or not, in this case. If MacLennan informed Neil Doncaster, the SPFL chief executive, of his role with INM and highlighted the links with Desmond and O’Brien then his conscience is clear. If Doncaster was told, as he should have been, then those details had to be passed onto to the SPFL Board, of which Robertson is a member. If both of those processes had been followed completely to the letter, it is unfathomable to see how we could have reached this point and how Rangers could have become so irked. Whether there is a conflict of interest or not, and there is no suggestion whatsoever that MacLennan has acted improperly in his dealings, that is only one issue. The details of a Private Eye article on MacLennan have yet to be addressed by the man who was appointed in July but has rarely been seen in public. Perceptions cannot be altered but the SPFL had a chance to properly address Rangers’ concerns and didn’t take it. For some, their actions speak louder than their words. That could also be said about other clubs that have watched on as the statement war has unfolded and have chosen to stay in their bunkers rather than put their heads above the parapet in public. When the position of the SPFL chairman has been called into question, that issue becomes bigger than Rangers v Celtic or King v Doncaster. If clubs don’t show their colours, only grey areas will remain. http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/16340933.chris-jack-questions-over-murdoch-maclennan-are-key-for-all-clubs-and-not-just-rangers/ Well, no-one likes you & you don't care - is that not how it goes?
|
|
|
| |
|
littlegmbhoy
|
9 Jul 2018, 04:57 PM
Post #10450
|
- Posts:
- 4,261
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #34,917
- Joined:
- 20 June 2016
- Favourite all-time player
- Henke
|
- Gothamcelt
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:48 PM
Chris Jack with his rallying call to other fans of other clubs to get involved with rangers moan. Chris Jack: Questions over Murdoch MacLennan are key for all clubs and not just RangersSpoiler: click to toggle Christopher Jack @Chris_Jack89 Group Senior Sports Writer THINGS are rarely black and white in the world of Scottish football and when it comes to Murdoch MacLennan it isn’t a case of blue and green. Rangers may be leading the calls for MacLennan’s head due to his business links with two Celtic powerbrokers but the issues over his position should be looked at by clubs across the country. When Ibrox chairman Dave King called for Gary Hughes, the then non-executive director of the Scottish FA, to be suspended, supporters of other sides could have been forgiven for shrugging their shoulders. The comments that Hughes made in a magazine interview in 2006 - in which he labelled Rangers fans ‘the great unwashed’ - angered the Light Blue legions and King. Weeks later, Hughes did not seek re-election to the Hampden board as he left his position after three years. That didn’t completely placate Rangers, however, and in a statement they called for a review of the SFA’s procedures and a probe into whether Hughes was party to any discussions regarding the Notice of Complaint in relation to their 2011/12 UEFA licence. That battle is very much between Ibrox and Hampden but the latest fight that King has taken up has consequences across the country and leagues. It is one that he has fought alone in public so far, however. Where Rangers have led, no others have followed as shots have been launched back and forth with no sign of being intercepted by friendly fire, or otherwise, from elsewhere. King has now shifted his crosshairs along the Sixth Floor at the National Stadium and MacLennan, the chairman of the SPFL, is firmly in his sights over his appointment to the board of Independent News and Media, a Dublin-based firm where Dermot Desmond and Denis O’Brien are influential shareholders. The SPFL have refused Rangers’ request for an independent investigation into MacLennan’s links with INM and the Ibrox board have now called for him to be removed from office at Hampden. In response, a spokesperson for the SPFL said: “We note the contents of Rangers’ latest press release. The board has already made its strong and overwhelming support for the chairman very clear and we consider the matter closed.” Read more: Rangers set to clinch deal for Roma striker Umar Sadiq before Europa League clash That won’t be how Rangers see it, though, especially when Stewart Robertson, the Ibrox Managing Director, and MacLennan, weren’t involved in the board discussion. The potential for a conflict of interest here is clear, well to most observers at least. It comes down to who told what to who. Or not, in this case. If MacLennan informed Neil Doncaster, the SPFL chief executive, of his role with INM and highlighted the links with Desmond and O’Brien then his conscience is clear. If Doncaster was told, as he should have been, then those details had to be passed onto to the SPFL Board, of which Robertson is a member. If both of those processes had been followed completely to the letter, it is unfathomable to see how we could have reached this point and how Rangers could have become so irked. Whether there is a conflict of interest or not, and there is no suggestion whatsoever that MacLennan has acted improperly in his dealings, that is only one issue. The details of a Private Eye article on MacLennan have yet to be addressed by the man who was appointed in July but has rarely been seen in public. Perceptions cannot be altered but the SPFL had a chance to properly address Rangers’ concerns and didn’t take it. For some, their actions speak louder than their words. That could also be said about other clubs that have watched on as the statement war has unfolded and have chosen to stay in their bunkers rather than put their heads above the parapet in public. When the position of the SPFL chairman has been called into question, that issue becomes bigger than Rangers v Celtic or King v Doncaster. If clubs don’t show their colours, only grey areas will remain. http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/16340933.chris-jack-questions-over-murdoch-maclennan-are-key-for-all-clubs-and-not-just-rangers/ Did we kick of when Campbell Ogilvie was put in place......er naw we never??
|
|
|
| |
|
Burnley Celt
|
9 Jul 2018, 05:04 PM
Post #10451
|
Old fud, taking things easy......
- Posts:
- 8,834
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #11,442
- Joined:
- 23 October 2007
- Favourite all-time player
- Billy McNeill
- Twitter Name
- @burnleycelt
|
- Gothamcelt
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:48 PM
Chris Jack with his rallying call to other fans of other clubs to get involved with rangers moan. Chris Jack: Questions over Murdoch MacLennan are key for all clubs and not just RangersSpoiler: click to toggle Christopher Jack @Chris_Jack89 Group Senior Sports Writer THINGS are rarely black and white in the world of Scottish football and when it comes to Murdoch MacLennan it isn’t a case of blue and green. Rangers may be leading the calls for MacLennan’s head due to his business links with two Celtic powerbrokers but the issues over his position should be looked at by clubs across the country. When Ibrox chairman Dave King called for Gary Hughes, the then non-executive director of the Scottish FA, to be suspended, supporters of other sides could have been forgiven for shrugging their shoulders. The comments that Hughes made in a magazine interview in 2006 - in which he labelled Rangers fans ‘the great unwashed’ - angered the Light Blue legions and King. Weeks later, Hughes did not seek re-election to the Hampden board as he left his position after three years. That didn’t completely placate Rangers, however, and in a statement they called for a review of the SFA’s procedures and a probe into whether Hughes was party to any discussions regarding the Notice of Complaint in relation to their 2011/12 UEFA licence. That battle is very much between Ibrox and Hampden but the latest fight that King has taken up has consequences across the country and leagues. It is one that he has fought alone in public so far, however. Where Rangers have led, no others have followed as shots have been launched back and forth with no sign of being intercepted by friendly fire, or otherwise, from elsewhere. King has now shifted his crosshairs along the Sixth Floor at the National Stadium and MacLennan, the chairman of the SPFL, is firmly in his sights over his appointment to the board of Independent News and Media, a Dublin-based firm where Dermot Desmond and Denis O’Brien are influential shareholders. The SPFL have refused Rangers’ request for an independent investigation into MacLennan’s links with INM and the Ibrox board have now called for him to be removed from office at Hampden. In response, a spokesperson for the SPFL said: “We note the contents of Rangers’ latest press release. The board has already made its strong and overwhelming support for the chairman very clear and we consider the matter closed.” Read more: Rangers set to clinch deal for Roma striker Umar Sadiq before Europa League clash That won’t be how Rangers see it, though, especially when Stewart Robertson, the Ibrox Managing Director, and MacLennan, weren’t involved in the board discussion. The potential for a conflict of interest here is clear, well to most observers at least. It comes down to who told what to who. Or not, in this case. If MacLennan informed Neil Doncaster, the SPFL chief executive, of his role with INM and highlighted the links with Desmond and O’Brien then his conscience is clear. If Doncaster was told, as he should have been, then those details had to be passed onto to the SPFL Board, of which Robertson is a member. If both of those processes had been followed completely to the letter, it is unfathomable to see how we could have reached this point and how Rangers could have become so irked. Whether there is a conflict of interest or not, and there is no suggestion whatsoever that MacLennan has acted improperly in his dealings, that is only one issue. The details of a Private Eye article on MacLennan have yet to be addressed by the man who was appointed in July but has rarely been seen in public. Perceptions cannot be altered but the SPFL had a chance to properly address Rangers’ concerns and didn’t take it. For some, their actions speak louder than their words. That could also be said about other clubs that have watched on as the statement war has unfolded and have chosen to stay in their bunkers rather than put their heads above the parapet in public. When the position of the SPFL chairman has been called into question, that issue becomes bigger than Rangers v Celtic or King v Doncaster. If clubs don’t show their colours, only grey areas will remain. http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/16340933.chris-jack-questions-over-murdoch-maclennan-are-key-for-all-clubs-and-not-just-rangers/ Jeez, even Boris Johnson knows you can't polish a turd.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheGloryYears
|
9 Jul 2018, 05:24 PM
Post #10452
|
Retired and now a BT Sports pundit
- Posts:
- 10,031
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #29,276
- Joined:
- 20 August 2011
- Favourite all-time player
- Frank McAvennie
|
- Wailer
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:05 PM
- spartacusthethird
- 9 Jul 2018, 03:51 PM
eff me, just eff, eff me.
The DR have really gone total mandarin
Hotline = some zoomer has called / written in. They've printed it though. They've printed it to get clicks and people talking about it . Worked then !
|
|
|
| |
|
weebaldy
|
9 Jul 2018, 05:26 PM
Post #10453
|
We Won the Big One-They Never Will!
- Posts:
- 2,229
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #28,009
- Joined:
- 22 February 2011
|
- littlegmbhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:05 PM
Signed
|
|
|
| |
|
weebaldy
|
9 Jul 2018, 05:38 PM
Post #10454
|
We Won the Big One-They Never Will!
- Posts:
- 2,229
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #28,009
- Joined:
- 22 February 2011
|
- kellybhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:56 PM
- weebaldy
- 9 Jul 2018, 02:15 PM
- kellybhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 02:02 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
This has went a wee bit mental. It originally began on a serious note following the assault on a priest and the apparent lack of action from the authorities. It has now descended to a tit for tat about people having a pee and the whether its right to photograph them  As a previous poster has already said, the vast majority of us have all been desperate enough to have a pee where we shouldn't but please don't let this petty argument distract us from the seriousness of the assault on a priest by the low life scum
I know. It's just the sight of those neaderthals lining up against the public library in full view of the cops that sickens me. Most people, decent people that is, will look for a spot out of the way, or behind a tree or something, not up against the wall of a public building where everyone, including kids, can see them. Someone suggested photographing them, and yer man got all indignant, so I was just reaction to his defence of these animals. There can be absolutely no defence for the majority of those participating or following an orange walk. There is now an argument that even the authorities should step in to do something but. as I said in an earlier post, they would be hesitant as it might loose them votes . One suggestion could be to have them walking around the trackside at ipox, with their drunken pishy followers etc. in the stands, till their little bigoted hearts are content
|
|
|
| |
|
Ned Rise
|
9 Jul 2018, 05:43 PM
Post #10455
|
These boots were made for hunbustin'
- Posts:
- 9,160
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #30,170
- Joined:
- 12 January 2012
|
- kellybhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:56 PM
- weebaldy
- 9 Jul 2018, 02:15 PM
- kellybhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 02:02 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
This has went a wee bit mental. It originally began on a serious note following the assault on a priest and the apparent lack of action from the authorities. It has now descended to a tit for tat about people having a pee and the whether its right to photograph them  As a previous poster has already said, the vast majority of us have all been desperate enough to have a pee where we shouldn't but please don't let this petty argument distract us from the seriousness of the assault on a priest by the low life scum
I know. It's just the sight of those neaderthals lining up against the public library in full view of the cops that sickens me. Most people, decent people that is, will look for a spot out of the way, or behind a tree or something, not up against the wall of a public building where everyone, including kids, can see them. Someone suggested photographing them, and yer man got all indignant, so I was just reaction to his defence of these animals. I wasn't 'defending the animals' you absolute troll.
If some starts a post saying "without sounding pervy" then there's a good chance it will. You think it's a good idea to take photos of women with their knickers at their ankles, well, good for you. You might get a sore face sometime for that kind of endeavour.
I'm assuming you carry out these public duties on a regular basis anytime you see someone having a piss?
Pointing out that's the behaviour of a crank is totally different to defending their behaviour, which I said was bogging. And since when did "the sight of those neanderthals lining up against the public library sicken you'?
You weren't even fukkin there. It was someone else's story.
|
|
|
| |
|
FenianJack
|
9 Jul 2018, 06:14 PM
Post #10456
|
- Posts:
- 4,879
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #6,829
- Joined:
- 3 February 2007
|
It’s time to start making up albums on the Entertainment thread.
|
|
|
| |
|
paulfg42
|
9 Jul 2018, 06:22 PM
Post #10457
|
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
- Posts:
- 42,390
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #42
- Joined:
- 31 August 2004
|
- weebaldy
- 9 Jul 2018, 05:38 PM
- kellybhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:56 PM
- weebaldy
- 9 Jul 2018, 02:15 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
I know. It's just the sight of those neaderthals lining up against the public library in full view of the cops that sickens me. Most people, decent people that is, will look for a spot out of the way, or behind a tree or something, not up against the wall of a public building where everyone, including kids, can see them. Someone suggested photographing them, and yer man got all indignant, so I was just reaction to his defence of these animals.
There can be absolutely no defence for the majority of those participating or following an orange walk. There is now an argument that even the authorities should step in to do something but. as I said in an earlier post, they would be hesitant as it might loose them votes  . One suggestion could be to have them walking around the trackside at ipox, with their drunken pishy followers etc. in the stands, till their little bigoted hearts are content There can't be many of those neanderthals left to threaten anyone's chances of election, bar the odd councillor or two. Time for all politicians to tell the OO they are not welcome.
|
|
|
| |
|
15not25
|
9 Jul 2018, 06:24 PM
Post #10458
|
- Posts:
- 2,176
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33,297
- Joined:
- 9 February 2014
- Favourite all-time player
- Andreas Thom
|
- FenianJack
- 9 Jul 2018, 06:14 PM
It’s time to start making up albums on the Entertainment thread. Caught With Our Pants Down by Damp Library
|
|
|
| |
|
Stockholm87
|
9 Jul 2018, 06:25 PM
Post #10459
|
- Posts:
- 1,099
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34,393
- Joined:
- 24 August 2015
- Favourite all-time player
- Lubo
|
- weebaldy
- 9 Jul 2018, 05:38 PM
- kellybhoy
- 9 Jul 2018, 04:56 PM
- weebaldy
- 9 Jul 2018, 02:15 PM
Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
I know. It's just the sight of those neaderthals lining up against the public library in full view of the cops that sickens me. Most people, decent people that is, will look for a spot out of the way, or behind a tree or something, not up against the wall of a public building where everyone, including kids, can see them. Someone suggested photographing them, and yer man got all indignant, so I was just reaction to his defence of these animals.
There can be absolutely no defence for the majority of those participating or following an orange walk. There is now an argument that even the authorities should step in to do something but. as I said in an earlier post, they would be hesitant as it might loose them votes  . One suggestion could be to have them walking around the trackside at ipox, with their drunken pishy followers etc. in the stands, till their little bigoted hearts are content “...It might lose them votes” so by authorities you mean political parties?. Some sort of offensive behaviour at walks act?
|
|
|
| |
|
Torquemada
|
9 Jul 2018, 06:28 PM
Post #10460
|
Off treasure hunting in Holland
- Posts:
- 12,932
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #216
- Joined:
- 15 September 2004
|
So Steven Gerrard has his team playing like a team that played when he was two? Time to get scared, bhoys -- there is no end to this man's talents.
Or maybe time to metaphorically wipe your arse with a newspaper that would allow such a tweet to go out in its name.
|
|
|
| |
57 users reading this topic (36 Guests and 0 Anonymous)
Members: johnny88,
kevinm1967,
BoboBalde6,
Donaldc,
Hooped_Crusader,
StealthBhoy,
FlyBhoy,
The Presidents Box,
stalker,
Bodom Bhoy,
paddyb,
4-4-2,
faboo,
Midnight,
vfranchetti,
yeti,
don73,
leith bhoy,
johnbhoy,
D4nny,
bigron68
|