|
The All New Sevco Back in Yer Bin Thread; Taking out the trash
|
|
Topic Started: 29 Apr 2018, 04:24 PM (2,086,625 Views)
|
|
Asgardstreasure
|
10 Jun 2018, 12:51 AM
Post #8141
|
Retired and now a BT Sports pundit
- Posts:
- 9,534
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #27,238
- Joined:
- 13 November 2010
- Favourite all-time player
- Billy McNeil
|
- Torquemada
- 10 Jun 2018, 12:26 AM
- damosuzuki
- 9 Jun 2018, 10:02 PM
- johnbhoy1958
- 9 Jun 2018, 09:25 PM
Sevco website saying Club1872 may have gone behind its members backs & arranged a loan to buy shares without informing them. Spoiler: click to toggle
daviesleftpeg Posted on June 9, 2018
Flimflam, Monkeyshines and Boondoggle
News is reaching us today, via a number of sources, on the topic of Club 1872 and the Rangers share offer. Despite trying various avenues to have the story verified, we have so far been unsuccessful. Whilst we genuinely hope it is not the case, we can only share the story in order that the matter may be cleared up.
Over the past few months, we became increasingly worried about the manner in which Club 1872 were endlessly begging for contributions, one off financial gifts and attempting to raise funding by any means possible. We found it strange and something we might expect, not from an organisation associated with our club or it’s fans, but from our rivals. The obvious use of emotional blackmail was thoroughly distasteful and reeked of desperation.
Today, we are being told that Club 1872, unbeknownst to members, secured funding to participate in the Rangers share issue by way of a loan agreed several weeks ago. If there is any truth in this story, Club 1872 has to make its members fully aware of the loan, its terms and the financial implications therein.
If you are a C1872 member, you have a duty to ask the organisation why, if this is the case, you were not informed. Why were you constantly asked for more contributions when funding was already in place? Why you were duped into thinking funds to buy the shares had yet to be secured? Why you were now being asked to hand over cash from the C1872 projects account to the shares account?
We truly hope this story can be verified as false and that the Directors of Club 1872 have not deceived its members. Many individuals are now spreading this information over social media and it’s a matter that desperately needs cleared up. The fans certainly don’t need to be the victims of any further subterfuge after the goings on of 2012. It would be a thoroughly despicable act should any organisation embark on such a scheme of dishonesty, double dealing, duplicity and deception. Will Club 1872 respond to these latest accusations, or will they remain quiet as they did when questioned over Chris “The Muslim Baiter” Graham’s involvement a few weeks ago?
God Bless Our Team
Nothing wrong with anything this guy says.
- Quote:
-
We found it strange and something we might expect, not from an organisation associated with our club or it’s fans, but from our rivals.
Really? Hibs or Aberdeen ?
|
|
|
| |
|
rightsaidted
|
10 Jun 2018, 12:57 AM
Post #8142
|
- Posts:
- 1,058
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33,487
- Joined:
- 11 May 2014
- Favourite all-time player
- Pat Stanton
|
- Torquemada
- 10 Jun 2018, 12:26 AM
- damosuzuki
- 9 Jun 2018, 10:02 PM
- johnbhoy1958
- 9 Jun 2018, 09:25 PM
Sevco website saying Club1872 may have gone behind its members backs & arranged a loan to buy shares without informing them. Spoiler: click to toggle
daviesleftpeg Posted on June 9, 2018
Flimflam, Monkeyshines and Boondoggle
News is reaching us today, via a number of sources, on the topic of Club 1872 and the Rangers share offer. Despite trying various avenues to have the story verified, we have so far been unsuccessful. Whilst we genuinely hope it is not the case, we can only share the story in order that the matter may be cleared up.
Over the past few months, we became increasingly worried about the manner in which Club 1872 were endlessly begging for contributions, one off financial gifts and attempting to raise funding by any means possible. We found it strange and something we might expect, not from an organisation associated with our club or it’s fans, but from our rivals. The obvious use of emotional blackmail was thoroughly distasteful and reeked of desperation.
Today, we are being told that Club 1872, unbeknownst to members, secured funding to participate in the Rangers share issue by way of a loan agreed several weeks ago. If there is any truth in this story, Club 1872 has to make its members fully aware of the loan, its terms and the financial implications therein.
If you are a C1872 member, you have a duty to ask the organisation why, if this is the case, you were not informed. Why were you constantly asked for more contributions when funding was already in place? Why you were duped into thinking funds to buy the shares had yet to be secured? Why you were now being asked to hand over cash from the C1872 projects account to the shares account?
We truly hope this story can be verified as false and that the Directors of Club 1872 have not deceived its members. Many individuals are now spreading this information over social media and it’s a matter that desperately needs cleared up. The fans certainly don’t need to be the victims of any further subterfuge after the goings on of 2012. It would be a thoroughly despicable act should any organisation embark on such a scheme of dishonesty, double dealing, duplicity and deception. Will Club 1872 respond to these latest accusations, or will they remain quiet as they did when questioned over Chris “The Muslim Baiter” Graham’s involvement a few weeks ago?
God Bless Our Team
Nothing wrong with anything this guy says.
- Quote:
-
We found it strange and something we might expect, not from an organisation associated with our club or it’s fans, but from our rivals.
Really? I had a look at some of his previous. Its quite twisted but funny too. He doesn't seem to see any connection between Chris Graham hating people on account of their race/religion and himself hating people on account of their race/religion. However, I read his piece on the appointment of Gerrard as manager and I conclude that he is non other than the famed D'Artagnan. Its got everything, Rangers fans the world over are known for being loyal and stoic. The world's most famous footballers have wished Gerrard well, but not only that, they all clearly want Rangers back where they belong. Scotland hates us, but outside Scotland we are loved. Tears are shed. And finally he concludes by stating that all of this will make us much more... "relevant!" Just about wet myself.
|
|
|
| |
|
PaulWilson
|
10 Jun 2018, 01:11 AM
Post #8143
|
- Posts:
- 1,298
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #24,851
- Joined:
- 24 November 2009
|
- Oscar Strummer
- 9 Jun 2018, 11:17 PM
- jim62
- 9 Jun 2018, 10:35 PM
- johnbhoy1958
- 9 Jun 2018, 09:25 PM
Sevco website saying Club1872 may have gone behind its members backs & arranged a loan to buy shares without informing them. Spoiler: click to toggle
daviesleftpeg Posted on June 9, 2018
Flimflam, Monkeyshines and Boondoggle
News is reaching us today, via a number of sources, on the topic of Club 1872 and the Rangers share offer. Despite trying various avenues to have the story verified, we have so far been unsuccessful. Whilst we genuinely hope it is not the case, we can only share the story in order that the matter may be cleared up.
Over the past few months, we became increasingly worried about the manner in which Club 1872 were endlessly begging for contributions, one off financial gifts and attempting to raise funding by any means possible. We found it strange and something we might expect, not from an organisation associated with our club or it’s fans, but from our rivals. The obvious use of emotional blackmail was thoroughly distasteful and reeked of desperation.
Today, we are being told that Club 1872, unbeknownst to members, secured funding to participate in the Rangers share issue by way of a loan agreed several weeks ago. If there is any truth in this story, Club 1872 has to make its members fully aware of the loan, its terms and the financial implications therein.
If you are a C1872 member, you have a duty to ask the organisation why, if this is the case, you were not informed. Why were you constantly asked for more contributions when funding was already in place? Why you were duped into thinking funds to buy the shares had yet to be secured? Why you were now being asked to hand over cash from the C1872 projects account to the shares account?
We truly hope this story can be verified as false and that the Directors of Club 1872 have not deceived its members. Many individuals are now spreading this information over social media and it’s a matter that desperately needs cleared up. The fans certainly don’t need to be the victims of any further subterfuge after the goings on of 2012. It would be a thoroughly despicable act should any organisation embark on such a scheme of dishonesty, double dealing, duplicity and deception. Will Club 1872 respond to these latest accusations, or will they remain quiet as they did when questioned over Chris “The Muslim Baiter” Graham’s involvement a few weeks ago?
God Bless Our Team
If they’re borrowing, how are they repaying it ? They have no income other than the donations and those donations are not guaranteed
And who is the lender ? And what security has been given ? Etc. etc. Ticketus
|
|
|
| |
|
C J Thorpe
|
10 Jun 2018, 02:03 AM
Post #8144
|
Off treasure hunting in Holland
- Posts:
- 13,192
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #4,006
- Joined:
- 8 June 2006
|
- Hooped_Crusader
- 9 Jun 2018, 09:37 PM
- johnbhoy1958
- 9 Jun 2018, 09:25 PM
Sevco website saying Club1872 may have gone behind its members backs & arranged a loan to buy shares without informing them. Spoiler: click to toggle
daviesleftpeg Posted on June 9, 2018
Flimflam, Monkeyshines and Boondoggle
News is reaching us today, via a number of sources, on the topic of Club 1872 and the Rangers share offer. Despite trying various avenues to have the story verified, we have so far been unsuccessful. Whilst we genuinely hope it is not the case, we can only share the story in order that the matter may be cleared up.
Over the past few months, we became increasingly worried about the manner in which Club 1872 were endlessly begging for contributions, one off financial gifts and attempting to raise funding by any means possible. We found it strange and something we might expect, not from an organisation associated with our club or it’s fans, but from our rivals. The obvious use of emotional blackmail was thoroughly distasteful and reeked of desperation.
Today, we are being told that Club 1872, unbeknownst to members, secured funding to participate in the Rangers share issue by way of a loan agreed several weeks ago. If there is any truth in this story, Club 1872 has to make its members fully aware of the loan, its terms and the financial implications therein.
If you are a C1872 member, you have a duty to ask the organisation why, if this is the case, you were not informed. Why were you constantly asked for more contributions when funding was already in place? Why you were duped into thinking funds to buy the shares had yet to be secured? Why you were now being asked to hand over cash from the C1872 projects account to the shares account?
We truly hope this story can be verified as false and that the Directors of Club 1872 have not deceived its members. Many individuals are now spreading this information over social media and it’s a matter that desperately needs cleared up. The fans certainly don’t need to be the victims of any further subterfuge after the goings on of 2012. It would be a thoroughly despicable act should any organisation embark on such a scheme of dishonesty, double dealing, duplicity and deception. Will Club 1872 respond to these latest accusations, or will they remain quiet as they did when questioned over Chris “The Muslim Baiter” Graham’s involvement a few weeks ago?
God Bless Our Team
Good statement, powerful alliteration in the last sentence. Delusional dickheads deliberately deceive dobers. Always a hallmark of Darryl Broadfoots writing.
|
|
|
| |
|
Tenenbaum
|
10 Jun 2018, 03:29 AM
Post #8145
|
Anybody interested in grabbing a couple of burgers and hittin' the cemetery?
- Posts:
- 1,064
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #35,678
- Joined:
- 23 June 2017
- Favourite all-time player
- Paul McStay
|
When the club 2012 members sent their money in so that they could have fan-owned shares in the club/company, I think they had in mind more than the one fan owning the shares 
Ah Sevco, never change!
|
|
|
| |
|
TheScotsman
|
10 Jun 2018, 05:06 AM
Post #8146
|
Everyone's Fantasy Football first pick
- Posts:
- 2,240
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #32,086
- Joined:
- 23 December 2012
- Favourite all-time player
- Ľubomír Moravčík
|
- doyle07
- 9 Jun 2018, 03:51 PM
- Ess
- 9 Jun 2018, 11:58 AM
So 1872 could end up throwing a million pounds in and end up with a lower percentage ?
was just thinking, 72 very symbolic for them, founded 1872, awarded cup winners cup in the bogs of the Nou Camp 1972, maybe 2072 rangers V1, finally get a result against us. Also average IQ is 72
|
|
|
| |
|
TheScotsman
|
10 Jun 2018, 05:13 AM
Post #8147
|
Everyone's Fantasy Football first pick
- Posts:
- 2,240
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #32,086
- Joined:
- 23 December 2012
- Favourite all-time player
- Ľubomír Moravčík
|
- jim62
- 8 Jun 2018, 11:28 PM
If Club1872 had anyone with half a brain on their committee or were getting proper advice they would be selling their shareholding to King when he has to offer at 20p and then waiting to buy the shares when they then come for sale at what will be a lower price
Or sabe the whole lot to invest in Rang3rs This is bang on Someone at club 1872 is not acting in the best interests of the fans What we don’t know is whether they know this - they may be out of their depth and getting duped by ‘advisors’ And think they’re doing the best thing.
I do feel sorry for the individual members because the majority are normal folk with financial pressures of their own just like most of us on here The whole scheme/scam is ripping them off and the money disappears, when they could be spending the same money on local goods and services benefiting themselves and local businesses
|
|
|
| |
|
danbhoy09
|
10 Jun 2018, 06:56 AM
Post #8148
|
- Posts:
- 4,255
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #24,604
- Joined:
- 12 October 2009
- Favourite all-time player
- Henke
|
- TheScotsman
- 10 Jun 2018, 05:06 AM
- doyle07
- 9 Jun 2018, 03:51 PM
- Ess
- 9 Jun 2018, 11:58 AM
So 1872 could end up throwing a million pounds in and end up with a lower percentage ?
was just thinking, 72 very symbolic for them, founded 1872, awarded cup winners cup in the bogs of the Nou Camp 1972, maybe 2072 rangers V1, finally get a result against us.
Also average IQ is 75 They ain't going to some special school to learn how to retread tires.
|
|
|
| |
|
Oscar Strummer
|
10 Jun 2018, 08:24 AM
Post #8149
|
The Artist Formerly Known As lubomir25
- Posts:
- 5,307
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #3,991
- Joined:
- 5 June 2006
|
- TheScotsman
- 10 Jun 2018, 05:13 AM
- jim62
- 8 Jun 2018, 11:28 PM
If Club1872 had anyone with half a brain on their committee or were getting proper advice they would be selling their shareholding to King when he has to offer at 20p and then waiting to buy the shares when they then come for sale at what will be a lower price
Or sabe the whole lot to invest in Rang3rs
This is bang on Someone at club 1872 is not acting in the best interests of the fans What we don’t know is whether they know this - they may be out of their depth and getting duped by ‘advisors’ And think they’re doing the best thing.
They would be out of their depth in a car park puddle.
|
|
|
| |
|
gary1888
|
10 Jun 2018, 08:36 AM
Post #8150
|
- Posts:
- 7,149
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #12,400
- Joined:
- 24 November 2007
- Favourite all-time player
- paul mcstay
|
I see the future England captain is about to jet in from Brighton ffs megabus more like.
|
|
|
| |
|
Gothamcelt
|
10 Jun 2018, 08:37 AM
Post #8151
|
Retired and now a BT Sports pundit
- Posts:
- 10,924
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #26,222
- Joined:
- 12 June 2010
- Favourite all-time player
- Sir Kenny Dalglish
|
The gardener gibbers, “I know Gary Mac very well and he’s a great lad. I’ve spoken to Gary briefly. I talk to him regularly, but lately I’ve been away, so I’ve not had a chance to speak to him in depth about joining Rangers".
FUND STEVIE Rangers MUST back Steven Gerrard in order to challenge Celtic for the league and win cups, says Ally McCoist The Liverpool legend arrives at Ibrox with no senior managerial experience but McCoist says the backing from the board is more important
Spoiler: click to toggle By Kenny MacDonald ALLY McCOIST admits appointing Steven Gerrard is a gamble for Rangers. And he says the Gers board’s backing is the key to whether it proves to be a successful one. Ibrox legend McCoist says Gerrard is certain to have sought assurances that he would be given the funds needed to challenge Celtic before taking his first managerial job. He said: “Gerrard is a good appointment and it’s certainly an interesting appointment, for the club and Scottish football. “It’s a gamble, but I’ve said all along that more important than the appointment of the manager is how much support he’s going to get doing the job. “He’ll need an opportunity to bring a better quality of player into Rangers. That’s the most important thing for the manager, whoever he was going to be. “I’d be very surprised if he hadn’t looked for one or two assurances before he came. “He’s named his backroom staff this week and he’s done the right thing with them because he will, 100 per cent, need people he can trust around him. “He’ll have that with Gary McAllister and I was very fortunate that I had that in my staff when I was at the club. “The added bonus for Stevie will hopefully be that there are others already there he can trust. “It’s his first job. Rangers was my first job, but I’d remind everyone I had a couple of years with Walter Smith assisting the national team and then more than four years assisting him at Rangers. “I had a fair idea what I was getting into. So I don’t think you can compare the two. “But the key is having people behind him he knows and trusts. “I know Gary Mac very well and he’s a great lad. I’ve spoken to Gary briefly. I talk to him regularly, but lately I’ve been away, so I’ve not had a chance to speak to him in depth about joining Rangers. “The last time I spoke to him was the Champions League Final and it was just a brief ‘How are you?’. We didn’t even discuss Scottish football. “I don’t know Stevie that well personally. But it’s interesting that you’ve got Frank Lampard going into Derby from that generation. “It wouldn’t surprise me if Rio Ferdinand looked at the two of them and he was the next one to give it a go.” Gerrard will face a hectic few weeks improving the Gers squad prior to the Europa League first qualifying round opener on July 12. And McCoist admits there will be no hiding place for the new management team at Ibrox. He said: “He needs a better quality of player. Rangers are where they are just now because that’s where the current squad should be. “You look at that squad and think ‘Second or third’. So I’m not surprised they finished where they did in the table last season. “I think people sometimes focus too much on wages and budgets. You just need to take a step back and look at the quality of player. That’s where Rangers are. “To eventually challenge Celtic at the top of the league and win cups they will need better quality. “Don’t get me wrong, they have some good players. I don’t believe they need 11 new players. But the squad needs improvement. “And of course there won’t be any honeymoon period for the new guy. He’ll need to hit the ground running. “When he got the job a few of the English lads phoned me and asked if he’d get a free hit at it for a season. I was like, ‘Are you having a laugh? No chance!’.” McCoist believes the return of Allan McGregor is a decent opening statement from the new Gers manager. He said: “Keepers are unique in they can go on a lot longer. “Allan won’t be coming up here with a mindset that he’ll be sitting on the bench. He’ll want to play and he clearly knows what the club is all about. “He was at Ibrox during better times and I would imagine his ego will be such that he’ll want to get them back there and experience that again. “I think his return will be welcomed by the vast majority of Rangers fans. “There are others players who I can understand them not being happy with potentially coming back. I’m not saying I agree with it, but I do get where they’re coming from.” https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/2762286/rangers-must-back-steven-gerrard-challlenge-celtic-ally-mccoist/
|
|
|
| |
|
tenerifetim
|
10 Jun 2018, 08:41 AM
Post #8152
|
- Posts:
- 7,273
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #29,009
- Joined:
- 6 July 2011
- Favourite all-time player
- henrik larrson
|
- TheScotsman
- 10 Jun 2018, 05:06 AM
- doyle07
- 9 Jun 2018, 03:51 PM
- Ess
- 9 Jun 2018, 11:58 AM
So 1872 could end up throwing a million pounds in and end up with a lower percentage ?
was just thinking, 72 very symbolic for them, founded 1872, awarded cup winners cup in the bogs of the Nou Camp 1972, maybe 2072 rangers V1, finally get a result against us.
Also average IQ is 72 Stevie G moving from Liverpool to Sevco has raised the average IQ of both teams!
|
|
|
| |
|
Ned Rise
|
10 Jun 2018, 08:50 AM
Post #8153
|
These boots were made for hunbustin'
- Posts:
- 9,160
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #30,170
- Joined:
- 12 January 2012
|
- TheScotsman
- 10 Jun 2018, 05:13 AM
- jim62
- 8 Jun 2018, 11:28 PM
If Club1872 had anyone with half a brain on their committee or were getting proper advice they would be selling their shareholding to King when he has to offer at 20p and then waiting to buy the shares when they then come for sale at what will be a lower price
Or sabe the whole lot to invest in Rang3rs
This is bang on Someone at club 1872 is not acting in the best interests of the fans What we don’t know is whether they know this - they may be out of their depth and getting duped by ‘advisors’ And think they’re doing the best thing. I do feel sorry for the individual members because the majority are normal folk with financial pressures of their own just like most of us on here The whole scheme/scam is ripping them off and the money disappears, when they could be spending the same money on local goods and services benefiting themselves and local businesses Can't see myself feeling sorry for them anytime soon.
They know who they're dealing with. A leopard doesn't change its spots, maybe just hides them with Rangers tat.
|
|
|
| |
|
smudgethecat
|
10 Jun 2018, 08:51 AM
Post #8154
|
- Posts:
- 758
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #34,532
- Joined:
- 3 November 2015
- Favourite all-time player
- Paul McStay
|
Good st.Atement. #Lets Go
|
|
|
| |
|
Gothamcelt
|
10 Jun 2018, 08:54 AM
Post #8155
|
Retired and now a BT Sports pundit
- Posts:
- 10,924
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #26,222
- Joined:
- 12 June 2010
- Favourite all-time player
- Sir Kenny Dalglish
|
Wonder if she know sanyhting about the sale of the club for a £1?
Wife of former Rangers owner Sir David Murray to brand him 'manipulative and controlling' in £10m divorce war Kate Tinto Murray will accuse her husband of being in a relationship with an ex-girlfriend.
Spoiler: click to toggle ByRussell Findlay The wife of former Rangers owner Sir David Murray will brand him “manipulative and controlling” in a £10million divorce action. Kae Tinto Murray, 46, will also accuse her tycoon husband of being in a relationship with an unnamed ex-girlfriend before and during their seven-year marriage. The details have emerged just weeks after the couple insisted they would remain “firm friends” despite their break-up. Kae will demand £18,000 a month for three years and present a damning account of her broken relationship with Sir David, 66. A friend said: “He was rude and condescending towards Kae. “He was constantly criticising her and destroyed her confidence. “Kae went for counselling to address her low self-esteem. “David told her when and how she could comminicate with him. “He even moved out of their home without giving an explanation and refused to communicate with her unless it was through their housekeeper.” Kae’s lawyer Rachael Kelsey will also ask the court to overturn a financial agreement made between the couple in the event of divorce. The prenuptial deal was signed before they tied the knot at Sir David’s Dunbarney estate near Bridge of Earn, Perthshire, in June 2011 — which was just weeks after he sold debt-stricken Rangers to Craig Whyte for £1. Kae believes that its terms are unreasonable and will argue that she had no choice but sign it in order to get married. She also agreed to the prenup because she believed that she would remain married to Sir David and that she could trust him. But after splitting in February, allegations emerged about his behaviour. She has claimed that Sir David was spotted with another woman in France and that before and during the marriage he continued a relationship with an ex-lover. The friend added: “Kae had no idea about these women, she trusted David when she signed the prenup. “She would have made a different decision had she been aware.” Former lawyer Kae has raised huge sums of money for cancer research with a series of endurance challenges including climbing Mount Kilimanjaro and trekking 100km through the Arctic Circle. Her family have substantial landholdings and property throughout Scotland and recently sold a site in North Lanarkshire to developers for a sum of more than £8million. She has twin teenage daughters to her first husband, while Sir David has two adult sons to his first wife, who died of cancer in 1992. Last night, Kae declined to comment. But the friend added: “When she and David split, there was still a chance that it could have remained amicable as they both said in their public statement. “But she has since been made aware of a number of issues which have destroyed all trust. When they got married, Kae was willing to sign the prenup because she was in love and didn’t want people to think she was only interested in his money. “However, she sacrificed her career to be at his side through all the long and hard years involving Rangers and his business difficulties. “Kae’s support through those years helped him pursue business interests. “Her lawyers have advised that the terms of the prenup are so draconian and unfair that they need to be challenged. “She is quite frank that she doesn’t expect £10million, which is a figure that’s been arrived at by lawyers — she just wants David to be reasonable so that they can both move on with their lives. “The most important thing is that she doesn’t want to be forced out of her home in Edinburgh. “Kae is a private person and will be feeling uncomfortable with the fuss.” The couple began dating in 2003 and got engaged three years later. They temporarily split in 2009 before getting married. At the time, Sir David said: “The time is right. Kae and I have been together for almost eight years and, after selling Rangers, this is a completely new chapter in my life. We make a great team.” Her friend told how during their marriage, Sir David became increasingly “reclusive” and spent significant periods of time at his Chateau Routas vineyard in the south of France. While there, she told how he did not want Kae to join him unless he invited her. At the beginning of this year, Kae arranged a holiday in the USA with her twin daughters but “at the last minute” Sir David said he was not going. Around the same time, she said she intended to travel to France to see him — but claims he ordered her to stay away. David made it clear to Kae that if she did so, there would be “obvious consequences” — which his wife took to mean their marriage would be over so she did not attend. They publicly announced their split in April. A statement made on the couple’s behalf at the time said: “It is with deep regret and sadness that Sir David Murray and Kae Tinto Murray announce that they have separated. “They recognise that they are at different stages of their lives and have different interests going forward. They will remain firm friends. “They ask that the media respect their privacy at this difficult time. There will be no further statements given.” Sir David made his fortune from the steel industry while in his 20s but lost both legs in a car crash in 1976. He bought Rangers in 1988, which was the start of an era in which the club dominated Scottish football. His wife was at Holyrood when the tycoon was knighted by the Queen in 2007. But following the 2008 global banking crisis, his property empire became crippled by debt. He was forced to surrender Rangers to Craig Whyte for a £1 coin. After Whyte’s disastrous reign saw Rangers liquidated, Sir David claimed he had been “duped” by the Motherwell-born businessman. In 2008, the Sunday Times Rich List estimated the entrepreneur was worth £720million. And while his wealth has not returned to the pre-crash high, this year’s rich list ranked him as Scotland’s 53rd richest person with a fortune of £150million. Scottish Government ministers are set to decide whether 1300 homes should be built on green belt land owned by Sir David. If granted, it would be the first stage in the creation of a £1billion “Garden District” near the Royal Bank of Scotland’s Gogarburn HQ. The couple’s case is due to call at the Court of Session in Edinburgh on Tuesday. Sir David did not respond to our requests for a comment. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/wife-former-rangers-owner-sir-12674748
|
|
|
| |
|
Novelty_Bauble
|
10 Jun 2018, 08:59 AM
Post #8156
|
- Posts:
- 8,126
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #34,371
- Joined:
- 17 August 2015
|
"He was forced to surrender Rangers to Craig Whyte for a £1 coin."
|
|
|
| |
|
15not25
|
10 Jun 2018, 09:05 AM
Post #8157
|
- Posts:
- 2,176
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33,297
- Joined:
- 9 February 2014
- Favourite all-time player
- Andreas Thom
|
- Novelty_Bauble
- 10 Jun 2018, 08:59 AM
"He was forced to surrender Rangers to Craig Whyte for a £1 coin." 
|
|
|
| |
|
Otis
|
10 Jun 2018, 09:08 AM
Post #8158
|
Has his boots and is available for selection
- Posts:
- 24,976
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #227
- Joined:
- 19 September 2004
|
Sounds like the Binbag taking Sevco all the way for those wages.
|
|
|
| |
|
Burnley Celt
|
10 Jun 2018, 09:08 AM
Post #8159
|
Old fud, taking things easy......
- Posts:
- 8,834
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #11,442
- Joined:
- 23 October 2007
- Favourite all-time player
- Billy McNeill
- Twitter Name
- @burnleycelt
|
So, will these pads in the Garden District have floating lawns?
|
|
|
| |
|
tenerifetim
|
10 Jun 2018, 09:19 AM
Post #8160
|
- Posts:
- 7,273
- Group:
- Snr. Member
- Member
- #29,009
- Joined:
- 6 July 2011
- Favourite all-time player
- henrik larrson
|
- Gothamcelt
- 10 Jun 2018, 08:54 AM
Wonder if she know sanyhting about the sale of the club for a £1? Wife of former Rangers owner Sir David Murray to brand him 'manipulative and controlling' in £10m divorce warKate Tinto Murray will accuse her husband of being in a relationship with an ex-girlfriend. Spoiler: click to toggle ByRussell Findlay The wife of former Rangers owner Sir David Murray will brand him “manipulative and controlling” in a £10million divorce action. Kae Tinto Murray, 46, will also accuse her tycoon husband of being in a relationship with an unnamed ex-girlfriend before and during their seven-year marriage. The details have emerged just weeks after the couple insisted they would remain “firm friends” despite their break-up. Kae will demand £18,000 a month for three years and present a damning account of her broken relationship with Sir David, 66. A friend said: “He was rude and condescending towards Kae. “He was constantly criticising her and destroyed her confidence. “Kae went for counselling to address her low self-esteem. “David told her when and how she could comminicate with him. “He even moved out of their home without giving an explanation and refused to communicate with her unless it was through their housekeeper.” Kae’s lawyer Rachael Kelsey will also ask the court to overturn a financial agreement made between the couple in the event of divorce. The prenuptial deal was signed before they tied the knot at Sir David’s Dunbarney estate near Bridge of Earn, Perthshire, in June 2011 — which was just weeks after he sold debt-stricken Rangers to Craig Whyte for £1. Kae believes that its terms are unreasonable and will argue that she had no choice but sign it in order to get married. She also agreed to the prenup because she believed that she would remain married to Sir David and that she could trust him. But after splitting in February, allegations emerged about his behaviour. She has claimed that Sir David was spotted with another woman in France and that before and during the marriage he continued a relationship with an ex-lover. The friend added: “Kae had no idea about these women, she trusted David when she signed the prenup. “She would have made a different decision had she been aware.” Former lawyer Kae has raised huge sums of money for cancer research with a series of endurance challenges including climbing Mount Kilimanjaro and trekking 100km through the Arctic Circle. Her family have substantial landholdings and property throughout Scotland and recently sold a site in North Lanarkshire to developers for a sum of more than £8million. She has twin teenage daughters to her first husband, while Sir David has two adult sons to his first wife, who died of cancer in 1992. Last night, Kae declined to comment. But the friend added: “When she and David split, there was still a chance that it could have remained amicable as they both said in their public statement. “But she has since been made aware of a number of issues which have destroyed all trust. When they got married, Kae was willing to sign the prenup because she was in love and didn’t want people to think she was only interested in his money. “However, she sacrificed her career to be at his side through all the long and hard years involving Rangers and his business difficulties. “Kae’s support through those years helped him pursue business interests. “Her lawyers have advised that the terms of the prenup are so draconian and unfair that they need to be challenged. “She is quite frank that she doesn’t expect £10million, which is a figure that’s been arrived at by lawyers — she just wants David to be reasonable so that they can both move on with their lives. “The most important thing is that she doesn’t want to be forced out of her home in Edinburgh. “Kae is a private person and will be feeling uncomfortable with the fuss.” The couple began dating in 2003 and got engaged three years later. They temporarily split in 2009 before getting married. At the time, Sir David said: “The time is right. Kae and I have been together for almost eight years and, after selling Rangers, this is a completely new chapter in my life. We make a great team.” Her friend told how during their marriage, Sir David became increasingly “reclusive” and spent significant periods of time at his Chateau Routas vineyard in the south of France. While there, she told how he did not want Kae to join him unless he invited her. At the beginning of this year, Kae arranged a holiday in the USA with her twin daughters but “at the last minute” Sir David said he was not going. Around the same time, she said she intended to travel to France to see him — but claims he ordered her to stay away. David made it clear to Kae that if she did so, there would be “obvious consequences” — which his wife took to mean their marriage would be over so she did not attend. They publicly announced their split in April. A statement made on the couple’s behalf at the time said: “It is with deep regret and sadness that Sir David Murray and Kae Tinto Murray announce that they have separated. “They recognise that they are at different stages of their lives and have different interests going forward. They will remain firm friends. “They ask that the media respect their privacy at this difficult time. There will be no further statements given.” Sir David made his fortune from the steel industry while in his 20s but lost both legs in a car crash in 1976. He bought Rangers in 1988, which was the start of an era in which the club dominated Scottish football. His wife was at Holyrood when the tycoon was knighted by the Queen in 2007. But following the 2008 global banking crisis, his property empire became crippled by debt. He was forced to surrender Rangers to Craig Whyte for a £1 coin. After Whyte’s disastrous reign saw Rangers liquidated, Sir David claimed he had been “duped” by the Motherwell-born businessman. In 2008, the Sunday Times Rich List estimated the entrepreneur was worth £720million. And while his wealth has not returned to the pre-crash high, this year’s rich list ranked him as Scotland’s 53rd richest person with a fortune of £150million. Scottish Government ministers are set to decide whether 1300 homes should be built on green belt land owned by Sir David. If granted, it would be the first stage in the creation of a £1billion “Garden District” near the Royal Bank of Scotland’s Gogarburn HQ. The couple’s case is due to call at the Court of Session in Edinburgh on Tuesday. Sir David did not respond to our requests for a comment. https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/wife-former-rangers-owner-sir-12674748 Old Girfriend ? Joanna Lumley ?
quote "Peter Stevenson “He told me about some metals convention he’d been to in Monaco. And he told me about meeting Joanna Lumley there. She’d have been a lovely 25-year-old then . And, he told me he’d had a crack at her, he told me he’d lost. But, the idea of the 26-year-old Scottish metal trader with no legs having a crack at Joanna Lumley. It tells you what a confident, assured guy he was, and honest, that he said he’d been rebuffed. ”"
|
|
|
| |
61 users reading this topic (37 Guests and 0 Anonymous)
Members: remy mcswain,
jinkyscat,
atalan,
londonroad,
johnny88,
kevinm1967,
BoboBalde6,
Donaldc,
Hooped_Crusader,
StealthBhoy,
FlyBhoy,
The Presidents Box,
stalker,
Bodom Bhoy,
paddyb,
4-4-2,
faboo,
Midnight,
vfranchetti,
yeti,
don73,
leith bhoy,
johnbhoy,
D4nny
|